I personally think it's real interesting how Mike Arnold made a hell of a review on a sponsor's product 4-5 months ago and even though they have sold out, re-stocked and certainly gotten the product to several people here....there are no glowing echoing additional reviews. I believe Mike..but where are the other people raving about injectable Superdrol?
He sold out very quickly...within a few weeks, I believe...maybe even faster. I received zero payment for that review, by the way. The only thing I received was three 10 ml vials (1,800 total mg of SD) and that was what I gave my review on. I also contacted him, as I was curious to see how well his injectable version worked. I had used a few injectable versions prior, but they either didn't work or didn't work very well. I know how well quality SD can work, as I had used numerous oral versions (including the original in 2005) with fantastic results. But...every injectable product I tried was poor.
Viking's was the first injectable SD that not only worked, but actually seemed to be slightly stronger, per mg, than the very best oral versions I had tried previously. This is not really surprising, being that pharmaceutical research has routinely demonstrated the ability of intramuscularly administered methyls to provide slightly better results than orally administration methyls. The most common one most people are aware of is Winstrol, but there are many others in the literature.
Anyway, after Viking ran out I believe he went to another sponsor to help him full his order (he was probably having trouble restocking quickly enough, didn't want his customers waiting any longer and needed help). So, those people didn't get the same product. I am not saying that is good or bad, as I've never used Scrioxx's product, but that's what I was told. If you look at the reviews of the original Viking SD that were posted around the same time I posted my review, you will see everyone said it was great...at least from an effectiveness standpoint. Some people still experienced appetite suppression and lethargy (although many said they either didn't, or it happened to a lesser degree), but I didn't see anyone saying it didn't provide very good results while they were on it.
The positivity of my review centered mainly on the fact that I didn't experience appetite suppression or lethargy from it, like I would with the oral version. I never really had an issue with lethargy, but appetite suppression was a big problem, so I was very happy to find out that injecting SD did not hamper my appetite to nearly the same degree as the oral, if at all. Many others said the same, but some said it affected them the same either way. Differences in personal response, I suppose. differences from the oal to the