aromasin:too powerful ?

[mike1107]

as I heard aromasin totally suppress the oestrogen production and that a little bit of oestrogen is better for muscles building, should it be too powerful ?
in my case,my main concern is about the "oestrogenic fat" I tend to gain as I'm not gyno prone..

 

[xcelbeyond]

I figure because it does a total suppresion that it would kick any hint of gyno in the ass!! That's why I keep some on hand. For reasons you stated (and exemastane is so stinking expensive) I'd go with (and do) letrozole.

xcel

 

[mike1107]

I figure because it does a total suppresion that it would kick any hint of gyno in the ass!! That's why I keep some on hand. For reasons you stated (and exemastane is so stinking expensive) I'd go with (and do) letrozole.

xcel

I can have it to a good price, but I think I'll go letrozole...I can't remember which one hinder gains by bad effects on IGF-1 levels: letrozole or anastrozole ?

 

[Ivan]

that would be

Anastrozole AKA arimidex, liquidex.

 

[xcelbeyond]

I can have it to a good price, but I think I'll go letrozole...I can't remember which one hinder gains by bad effects on IGF-1 levels: letrozole or anastrozole ?

Letrozole increases IGF-1 levels!! Depending on what report you read, anastrozole has very little effect or "slightly increases" IGF-1. Given my druthers, I'd rather use letrozole during cycle and anastrozole, along with clomid for post-cycle!

xcel