we posted the chemical test on this thread for MENT, it is real and the test proves it...
take a lighter to the DNP and see if it lights up.. id stand back......
teh t3? its hard to feel t3.... unless you take a lot which is not advisable....
IMO his aromasin is garbage too. I didn't get bloods but I can tell my estro has been out of wack high since starting their AI's.
I'm stupid for choosing to use research chem AI's anyway, going to spend a little more and go pharm for AI and T3 from now on. Fuck these guys, their company, and the shit products they sell. Everyone do yourselves a favor and don't waste your money. The only reason they are selling anything is because so many of the other GOOD research chem companies went under recently from potential legal issues.
Go through your regular AAS source and get this stuff, pharm if possible. If you need sources, PM somebody on here like myself who knows what's what.
EA do you speak with Tony Huge?
I have never come out against a sponsor since being a member.
I can personally vouch for having tried both
EA-DNP
EA- T3
They are both GARBAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CG
I'm on 200 mg of DNP and it seems to be working. I get real hot if I eat carbs and if lost about 10 pounds in 3 weeks or so. This is my first DNP run so it's new to me.
Let's get one thing straight, CG isn't some newb or one of these naive young YouTubers you can fuck out of his money. We are talking about a real competitor here that has actually won shows and doesn't have to prove shit to anyone. As far as I'm concerned, his word is golden. I've never seen him call out a sponsor.
And why did a 5 year old have to scribble EA MENT on the lab test? Wtf? Why didn't it have it printed right on there? These are like the fake tests all the chinese raw guys send everytime someone questions a product. It's 2017, that paper looks like it came out of the last century....
For you to even try and pull that stupid shit shows your scumbag character.
Yes, I remember that. But is this the results of what PA did? I am baffled if so because this doesn't look real at all. Especially since we have been doing testing on GH and AAS here and at ansci and those don't look like this from what I recall.Not that I wanna get caught up in the chaos of good, bad or indifferent. As I've not used any of EA's stuff, nor care too. Although he (EA) offered me a "freebie of some Ment" for putting him in touch with PA. I declined, I wasn't after it for a hand-me-out purpose. More so, EA started a thread awhile back looking to get in touch with PA. Patrick and I are friends, so it wasn't but just a text-away. Figured I'd help the guy out.
I can say this. I put EA in touch with Patrick Arnold around the same "time date, stamp" on the analysis he posted up. I also have text messages between Patrick and I of where he's stating it's "Ment".
Whether or not PA wrote that on the paper, or if EA did, I dunno? I do know the time frame matches within a few days after I contacted PA.
I believe there is a recent thread started by Cinder that PA was putting out his thoughts about EA MENT. He had nothing but good things to say about it, so not sure what happened.