• All new members please introduce your self here and welcome to the board:
    http://www.professionalmuscle.com/forums/showthread.php?t=259
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
M4B Store Banner
ddd
Riptropin Store banner
Generation X Bodybuilding Forum
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Mysupps Store Banner
IP Gear Store Banner
Anabolic Hormones Store Banner
Ganabol Store Banner
Spend $100 and get bonus needles free at sterile syringes
Professional Muscle Store open now
LandmarkChem Email Banner
Medtech Store Banner
Bruce Labs Store banner
qtropin
Professional Muscle Store open now
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store

EQ and Dbol: More Similar than Different?

rippedyearround

Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
411
I've read in many places that EQ was the result of attempts to make an injectable form of the original Dianabol. I've used both compounds, and while I certainly wouldn't say they are the 'same' in behavior, I also wouldn't say they are tremendously different either.

Both deliver:
- amazing pumps
- great strength gains
- improvements in vascularity
- significant increase in appetite
- less water retention than testosterone (i'm not a guy who typically gets bad water retention anyway...so...this is subjective)
- very 'full' feeling and look to the muscles

My question is this: Aside from the slight structural alterations between them, do you think the differences between these compounds is due to the long (undecylenate, longer than decoanate) ester that is attached to the boldenone rather than the c17 modification? Would you expect to see VERY similar gains if you could find a boldenone suspension or a methandrostenolone undecylenate?

I'm just throwing this out there for discussion.
 

Attachments

Newman

New member
Registered
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
850
Interesting post bro. I'm sorta surprised I'm the 1st to respond.

Got some EQ laying around. I always thought of Dbol as a bulker & EQ as a cutter.

Maybe I should try some...
 

wardog50

New member
Registered
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
422
Ive read they are identical and seen the same diagrams etc as above.
The only differences being those you stated, methylation versus esterification.

Who knows what differences might abound in the question.
D-bol has been around for a day, I mean the Nazis used it even in the 40's.

Things on paper don't always pan out to what they would seem though.

Hell on paper Proviron would be one of the most powerful steroids ever made.
The truth is its good and has its uses but def not the most powerful.

Id be interested in seeing some more versions of these two to come out.
I personally don't like the idea of adding an ester to a methylated or alkylated hormone as the methyl or alkyl group will be swimming around possibly causing more needless havoc.

Different esters and possible alkylation vs methylation would be interesting though.

War
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Total page views
501,919,585
Threads
123,365
Messages
2,348,271
Members
155,065
Latest member
MrIronstone
Top