Im assuming the newer approach might not bode well with the person who thinks about this stuff from a "x amount required" standpoint.I'll be completely honest here. I USED TO. When I was more tunnel visioned 4 years ago, I would make immediate judgments on bodytypes from all the questions I asked them, all the pics I requested of their "previous best" past usage etc.... I would ensure certain things like GH and Tren were in play for guys that appeared to need some serious assistance.
However , now days, regardless of their genetic or what I THINK of their potential, I will try to be as safe and rational as possible with my approach.
-FF
Matt, what was your highest off season dosage and compounds? And how high did you push the calories?
How do you train these days also?
Matt,
How was the 18 weeks of Primo on your hair line?
Auspex
Matt
Do I think that deca/npp and eq are better for growing mass than say... Tren?
Thanks a lot for your insights.
Yes great to see you Matt...and great to see you too Big Mike!Glad to see you come back here Matt and address this thread.
Happy New Years my good friend!
Glad to see you come back here Matt and address this thread.
Happy New Years my good friend!
^
Most forums are loaded with bullshit. Most YouTubes are loaded with bullshit. Most people are full of bullshit. That is just the norm.
-FF
FF, do you still think it’s better to use long acting compounds like EQ for only 8 weeks and then switch compounds? Have you found this to be more effective than using EQ, deca etc for longer periods of time? Thanks
No way Jose!
I think tren is the best there is. But imo it might also pose the most threat of non methylated injectables. It's very andogenic and most likely will bind very hard to prostate , HEART, and everything else and cause enlargement to all muscles.
In retrospect , I think nandrolone are risky too. I'd prefer testosterone derivatives.
-FF
Hey matt.. Just did the Muscle Minds podcast with scott Stevenson.. He touched on that nandrolone study about it being damaging to blood vessels etc.. Had a interesting take on how the experiment ( the paper published ) went.. Check out the podcast as it was pretty enlightening..