- Joined
- Mar 16, 2007
- Messages
- 25,912
I feel sickened that I've just wasted a few minutes of my life reading that, it would of been more productive to watch my grass grow.
Exactly. Doesn't in any way show test isn't test. The differing peaks, clearance times of different esters effect suppression, estrogen conversion etc... DUH! What's really new here?doesn't in anyway show that test isn't test.
Besides, you’ll wanna look smart next time someone asks you “why”, right?
He likes to think he's really special dont he what an arse. A big ass essay to say something thats pretty obvious, and doesn't in anyway show that test isn't test.
I feel sickened that I've just wasted a few minutes of my life reading that, it would of been more productive to watch my grass grow.
waste of time. should be in the beginners forum
Not that this wasn't known already but this pretty much proves it to be true.
No. Test is still test. The fact that different esters behave somewhat different during use has nothing to do with the ester itself and everything to do with time - the time they are in the body and the steadiness of the plasma levels. What do you think will cause greater expression of aromatase and reductase? An ester or suspension of testosterone that leaves the body in a few days or one that stays in the body and is released over a number of weeks? Once freed from depot and in the bloodstream it all happens fairly fast and after the esterase enzymes (there are many) free the testosterone from the molecule, IT'S JUST PLAIN TESTOSTERONE. That's all. I wish there was some magic in the esters but there's just not. It's just chemistry. Sorry.I thought it was a pretty good article. I still see people asking what is better short or long esters and people say test is test the ester has no effect... Test is not test. Long esters = better bulkers, short esters = better cutters and safer for people with gyno troubles. Not that this wasn't known already but this pretty much proves it to be true.