That site did nothing to act as a rebuttal to my argument-in fact just taking one of their studies used and referenced in that site (under Tuberculosis Studies in Scientific Stuff) titled
Mycobacterium bovis in England and Wales: past, present and future said this: "Outbreaks of tuberculosis due to M. bovis continue to occur in cattle. Wild animals, particularly badgers, have been implicated as reservoirs of the infection. However, man may also prove to be an important reservoir of M. bovis for cattle as well as humans."
So, on a pro-raw milk website they actually use a study that says people are still at risk at receiving tuberculosis from cattle? Wow, lulz were had.