- Joined
- Jan 7, 2011
- Messages
- 37
Ive been reading up on GH and trying to decide if I want to spend the money on it. I’ve read from some people that GH gains tend to be more permanent than AAS due to the creation of new muscle cells. For example, say if you had two identical twins and once just cycled AAS for 5-10 years and the other one cycled AAS and GH for 5-10 years and after the 10 year period both of them went off everything except maybe a TRT dosage of test while remaining to train and diet correctly, do you think the one that ran GH would be able to maintain a larger size for the rest of their life?
The reason I ask is because I dont want to have to run AAS and GH for the rest of my life (except for my TRT) to maintain a respectable size. I would like to be able to run GH for the next 5-10 years if that could set me up for maintaining a decent size for the rest of my life (along with continuing to train and diet correctly).
The reason I ask is because I dont want to have to run AAS and GH for the rest of my life (except for my TRT) to maintain a respectable size. I would like to be able to run GH for the next 5-10 years if that could set me up for maintaining a decent size for the rest of my life (along with continuing to train and diet correctly).