- Joined
- Jan 17, 2006
- Messages
- 1,047
What kind of changes would you have made to your first three cycles knowing what you know now? It could be anything from dosages, compounds, cycle lengths, etc. And why would you make those decisions?
HUTCH said:I woulda run my first one longer...I think that is why people lose so much after their first cycle because they add so much weight and muscle so quick that the body cant adapt after only 12 weeks...
DaRooster said:I dont think the longevity of a cycle determines its success. Its well know that after 12-16 weeks you get diminishing returns unless you increase the dosages. I think the short intense cycles with bridging small amounts between is more productive and healthier. and the other thing is the multiple drug cycles. From the pros Ive talked to... They dont use 4 and 5 different things. most use high amounts of test and one other thing. Anything else is used to dial in for a show.
BrooklynBB said:So how long would you have run it then? And WHAT would you have run? Your input means alot Hutch..
HUTCH said:Well I ran t400, dbol, and deca but I woulda switched the Deca for EQ, cuz I couldnt go over 300mgs of deca other wise it was by bye sex life..I would have ran the cycle for the normal twelve then just use the Test for about 6 more weeks after that..so a total of 18 weeks on..
BrooklynBB said:t400 = enanthate? And how much EQ / Dbol? Hypothetical...
I ran 30mgs a day of dbol...If I woulda done EQ I wouldve ran 400mg a week..BrooklynBB said:t400 = enanthate? And how much EQ / Dbol? Hypothetical...
HUTCH said:I ran 30mgs a day of dbol...If I woulda done EQ I wouldve ran 400mg a week..
BrooklynBB said:What's your feelings on Deca? (Thanks for answering all the questions, by the way)