- Joined
- May 23, 2004
- Messages
- 5,920
Most of the time I don't dedicate a full workout to arms, but when I do I usually avoid training the upper body the day after in an attempt to let them recover properly... which "theoretically" would be compromised for bi's if I had rows or pulls done in that session, and for tri's if I were to hit pressing movments.
A few weeks ago however, I did chest the day following my arm workout, and while I was mentally getting ready to not lift my heavier weights due to still fatigued triceps from the day before, to my greatest surprise I did my best perfs ever on barbell decline presses!
Since I got intrigued I then decided to work my back the day after my next arm workout, and then again... besf lifts ever on db rows... my biceps could handle the load.
I've been working out that way since, and my poundages just keep getting heavier or my reps higher... WTF?
Aren't you "supposed" to be weaker in an exercice involving a muscle just worked less 24h ago, ie not fully regenerated?
If any what's the science behind it?
A few weeks ago however, I did chest the day following my arm workout, and while I was mentally getting ready to not lift my heavier weights due to still fatigued triceps from the day before, to my greatest surprise I did my best perfs ever on barbell decline presses!
Since I got intrigued I then decided to work my back the day after my next arm workout, and then again... besf lifts ever on db rows... my biceps could handle the load.
I've been working out that way since, and my poundages just keep getting heavier or my reps higher... WTF?
Aren't you "supposed" to be weaker in an exercice involving a muscle just worked less 24h ago, ie not fully regenerated?
If any what's the science behind it?
Last edited: