Steak Helmet
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2002
- Messages
- 3,747
http://www.filecabi.net/video/Pit_Bull_Myths.html
I thought this was well done and wanted to share with you all.
I thought this was well done and wanted to share with you all.
I will probably get a lot of flack for this..but here goes.
I am a "former" pit bull owner myself. Love the dogs when they are right. Hate them when they aren't. Where I am from they are currently looking to ban the dogs in the inner city. I can't really say that I blame them. I live in a rough area of town, and EVERYBODY has a pitbull(s). Regardless of how beautiful of a dog they are when they are right, it is horrible scary when they are wrong. My particular pitbull would attack my other dogs when it saw a squirrel or prey in the yard through the window. Vicious attacks. I grew up with dobies, boxers and other dogs my whole upbringing. I am well versed in their ways, and training. Nothing I tried (everything) would get this dog to curb it's ways. It was simply crazy, and I had to put it down after one ferocious attack that left my other dog maimed badly. The problem with owners and breeders forget is that this dog for the most part was bred to fight. I had an amazing pitbull reference manual written in the late fifties I believe that basically stated that the dog was born to fight, and if you didn't train your dog to fight, and fight it often then you were doing it a disservice. It described how the dogs loved/lived to fight. It had mapped out some of the most famous examples of all times. Amazing fotos of dogs, and these old southern men running them on treadmills, and fighting them, game testing etc....It was fascinating. A lot of the dogs we have today are very mismanaged and inbred. A lot of them aren't right in the head. I've seen it over, and over. A lot of what pit bull owners will not own up to is the after math of an attack. Every dog breed bites, and attacks. I was bitten by a mini poodle once (never by a bull) - the problem is that when a collie attacks you...things are usually ok afterword. Bones aren't broken, and bodies aren't ripped to shreds. Terrier breeds have a tenacity that is far above other dogs for the most part. They also have a superior pain threshold. When they clamp - it's bad news. So this is the problem that the media fixates on. When the dogs go off people die, are maimed, etc..It is unlike other breeds. So sometimes I liken it to the banning of machine guns vs. pistols. It may not be correct - but it is understandable. I really don't trust my fellow citizen anymore. There are too many 50cent/Eminem wannabes running around the hood with their bulls. In my opinion it's a ticking time bomb...actually we have already had a few children's lived destroyed (which prompted the proposition to ban in the first place).
PUNISH THE DEED NOT THE BREED!
I will probably get a lot of flack for this..but here goes.
I am a "former" pit bull owner myself. Love the dogs when they are right. Hate them when they aren't. Where I am from they are currently looking to ban the dogs in the inner city. I can't really say that I blame them. I live in a rough area of town, and EVERYBODY has a pitbull(s). Regardless of how beautiful of a dog they are when they are right, it is horrible scary when they are wrong. My particular pitbull would attack my other dogs when it saw a squirrel or prey in the yard through the window. Vicious attacks. I grew up with dobies, boxers and other dogs my whole upbringing. I am well versed in their ways, and training. Nothing I tried (everything) would get this dog to curb it's ways. It was simply crazy, and I had to put it down after one ferocious attack that left my other dog maimed badly. The problem with owners and breeders forget is that this dog for the most part was bred to fight. I had an amazing pitbull reference manual written in the late fifties I believe that basically stated that the dog was born to fight, and if you didn't train your dog to fight, and fight it often then you were doing it a disservice. It described how the dogs loved/lived to fight. It had mapped out some of the most famous examples of all times. Amazing fotos of dogs, and these old southern men running them on treadmills, and fighting them, game testing etc....It was fascinating. A lot of the dogs we have today are very mismanaged and inbred. A lot of them aren't right in the head. I've seen it over, and over. A lot of what pit bull owners will not own up to is the after math of an attack. Every dog breed bites, and attacks. I was bitten by a mini poodle once (never by a bull) - the problem is that when a collie attacks you...things are usually ok afterword. Bones aren't broken, and bodies aren't ripped to shreds. Terrier breeds have a tenacity that is far above other dogs for the most part. They also have a superior pain threshold. When they clamp - it's bad news. So this is the problem that the media fixates on. When the dogs go off people die, are maimed, etc..It is unlike other breeds. So sometimes I liken it to the banning of machine guns vs. pistols. It may not be correct - but it is understandable. I really don't trust my fellow citizen anymore. There are too many 50cent/Eminem wannabes running around the hood with their bulls. In my opinion it's a ticking time bomb...actually we have already had a few children's lived destroyed (which prompted the proposition to ban in the first place).
Bottom line is, I was agreeing with you until you mentioned those scumbag "southern gentlemen" and how fascinating they are. They are no better and have the same mentality as the ghetto thugs. PUNISH THE DEED, NOT THE BREED. BSL LAWS ARE BULLSHIT.
man damn good post bro! very few people know the actually history of this breed, im glad you took the time to do a little studying. and your last point was right on the money, people aren't making them guys get in that cage to beat the shit out of each other they do it for the love of it, the same goes with pits, they do it for the love of it cause thats what they were bred to do! pitdogs are scary to have around other animals, but the best damn pet and people lover you will find, they were culled to be that way, if you got in the pit in the old days and had 300 dollars waged on your dog and during the fight your dog bit the other handler that was in the pit, you lost your money, so that human hostility was cured out of them.Thanx for the response - but maybe you should read my post a little more carefully before you start. First off- No where did I say "GENTLEMAN"....you made it sound like I revered these people. I said old Southern MEN. Second, from a scholarly approach IT IS FASCINATING TO ME. It's no different than when I am reading about Sicilian Mafia members, or Nazi's, or any other social outcast/criminal types. Know thy enemy friend. You can hardly speak intelligently on something unless you know a little background. Third - a great majority of these animals (like every other animal) sprung from some of these breeds that were cultivated by these very men. Whether you believe it or not, these guys truly loved their dogs. They truly believed that the dog was born to "compete", and trained them as athletes. These dogs were explicitly required to love their masters/people in general. A dog that didn't was cast aside. The whole theory of game testing springs from this. No dog fought..unless it wanted to fight. It had to be able to be handled without injury to humans. It was very organized, and taken very seriously. You don't have to teach a dog to fight for it to want to go toe to toe with another animal also. Just because you have a dog that doesn't- hardly changes this reality. Most pits I know are very animal aggressive, and yet babydolls to people. Fifth - it strikes me a very hypocritical that some of the same people that cry about dog fighting will watch two grown men beat the schnitzel out of eachother in a cage FOR MONEY.
Thanx for the response - but maybe you should read my post a little more carefully before you start. First off- No where did I say "GENTLEMAN"....you made it sound like I revered these people. I said old Southern MEN. Second, from a scholarly approach IT IS FASCINATING TO ME. It's no different than when I am reading about Sicilian Mafia members, or Nazi's, or any other social outcast/criminal types. Know thy enemy friend. You can hardly speak intelligently on something unless you know a little background. Third - a great majority of these animals (like every other animal) sprung from some of these breeds that were cultivated by these very men. Whether you believe it or not, these guys truly loved their dogs. They truly believed that the dog was born to "compete", and trained them as athletes. These dogs were explicitly required to love their masters/people in general. A dog that didn't was cast aside. The whole theory of game testing springs from this. No dog fought..unless it wanted to fight. It had to be able to be handled without injury to humans. It was very organized, and taken very seriously. You don't have to teach a dog to fight for it to want to go toe to toe with another animal also. Just because you have a dog that doesn't- hardly changes this reality. Most pits I know are very animal aggressive, and yet babydolls to people. Fifth - it strikes me a very hypocritical that some of the same people that cry about dog fighting will watch two grown men beat the schnitzel out of eachother in a cage FOR MONEY.