- Joined
- Aug 16, 2008
- Messages
- 945
For some reason there are people on the board who are obsessed with "genetics".
Every thread turns into a genetics debate. Instead of providing some insight into better ways to train or eat, or use aas, people just say " doesn't matter, the answer is genetics"
It's really getting pathetic.
Does anyone really believe there is a bodybuilding gene? Something that makes you predisposed to look like the judges on the Mr O panel want you to look like? Does this gene change over time like the judges opinion?
Many people argue that if all variables are equal, then the guy with the best genetics wins. This is not a reasonable argument.
First, all variables are never equal.
Second, the pros, and ams, figure out what works best for them and use it to their advantage to beat the next guy. What I mean by this is, for some people, diet is their secret weapon, others, their training, or their aas regimine, or some combination of all three.
But everybodies winning combination is different. The guy who wins is the guy who finds his winning combination and uses it to his or her best advantage.
Do you ever notice when you read in Flex or MF that all these guys do things differently. Sure, certain basics are the same. But each guy has his own secret weapon and they are never the same.
Sure there is no doubt that genetics plays a role in bodybuilding. But if you don't figure out how to take advantage of how your body works then it doesn't mean doodoo.
And think about it, the look for Mr O changes over time. No one is predisposed to look like this.
I could go on and on, but I'm sure it would fall on deaf ears.
Every thread turns into a genetics debate. Instead of providing some insight into better ways to train or eat, or use aas, people just say " doesn't matter, the answer is genetics"
It's really getting pathetic.
Does anyone really believe there is a bodybuilding gene? Something that makes you predisposed to look like the judges on the Mr O panel want you to look like? Does this gene change over time like the judges opinion?
Many people argue that if all variables are equal, then the guy with the best genetics wins. This is not a reasonable argument.
First, all variables are never equal.
Second, the pros, and ams, figure out what works best for them and use it to their advantage to beat the next guy. What I mean by this is, for some people, diet is their secret weapon, others, their training, or their aas regimine, or some combination of all three.
But everybodies winning combination is different. The guy who wins is the guy who finds his winning combination and uses it to his or her best advantage.
Do you ever notice when you read in Flex or MF that all these guys do things differently. Sure, certain basics are the same. But each guy has his own secret weapon and they are never the same.
Sure there is no doubt that genetics plays a role in bodybuilding. But if you don't figure out how to take advantage of how your body works then it doesn't mean doodoo.
And think about it, the look for Mr O changes over time. No one is predisposed to look like this.
I could go on and on, but I'm sure it would fall on deaf ears.