- Joined
- Jan 31, 2016
- Messages
- 353
After reading JoeyDHB's "SARMS really?" thread. It got me thinking.
Some people have had good experiences with S23 and some didn't but I might like to try it sometime, some like RAD 140 and YK11.
Ostarine MK-2866 gave me good strength increases but T-bol was better. MK 677 made me strong but I just bloated worse than d-bol, didn't feel like GH at all. I had a good response to LGD (but it totally tanked my HDL...), Cardarine is the only one I can really vouch for, even 5mg ed gives you the endurance to plug through 1 hr cardio sessions in addition to training on the same day.
But here's my question, considering the cost (which is considerable) for SARMS do they really make more sense than AAS? If you want size, use test. Endurance, use EQ, etc... Are there some SARMS that do something that AAS won't?
If so, which ones would you use?
For me, I'm looking run GH with moderate dose Test E 400, Primo E 400 for 20 wks and will include Cardarine prob @10mg ed.
Some people have had good experiences with S23 and some didn't but I might like to try it sometime, some like RAD 140 and YK11.
Ostarine MK-2866 gave me good strength increases but T-bol was better. MK 677 made me strong but I just bloated worse than d-bol, didn't feel like GH at all. I had a good response to LGD (but it totally tanked my HDL...), Cardarine is the only one I can really vouch for, even 5mg ed gives you the endurance to plug through 1 hr cardio sessions in addition to training on the same day.
But here's my question, considering the cost (which is considerable) for SARMS do they really make more sense than AAS? If you want size, use test. Endurance, use EQ, etc... Are there some SARMS that do something that AAS won't?
If so, which ones would you use?
For me, I'm looking run GH with moderate dose Test E 400, Primo E 400 for 20 wks and will include Cardarine prob @10mg ed.