- Joined
- May 28, 2006
- Messages
- 618
Do you ever think there will be a day where training will exclusively be done in the stretch position? I'm talking about something along the lines as DC stretches (but exclusively). Loads can be consistently increased, and are held for a prescribed amount of time? Hyperplasia (if true, and I believe it is) will be taking effect. With a properly prescribed amount of time in the stretch position, not only does the muscle go through hyperplasia but mitochondrial density increases (supposedly). This will send the metabolism higher (another added benefit). The muscle goes through an involuntary contraction while being stretched and muscle fibers are being exhausted, and lengthened. Not only that the loads carried in the greatest angle of the joint will transfer over to full range. I understand stretching with these loads may have to be close to 1 minute per hold at least and will likely eventually become very heavy, but maybe this is all that needs to happen?
If one were a strength athlete I don't think this is the best option due to muscle stiffness being a favorable attribute. But for bodybuilders this would seem to work.
I went through a period of exclusively training in the stretch position, and I think my muscles looked hard and so much more developed. To tell you the truth, I only stopped, because I was losing weight so fast, and with phil's diet grocery bills can get expensive with the appetite I had. I would add weight when possible and hold them (with proper form) for as long as possible, and I would have a cumulative amount of time for each hold for about 3-6 minutes, with maybe 3-4 breaks in between. I did actually try to stretch even deeper by using antagonist muscles to push/pull me deeper. My strength stayed about the same, maybe a little stronger, but power definitely increased. I felt very fast.
I'm not saying this is an optimal way to train, there are so many great programs out there. But say if you were able to hold 400 lbs one your back (maybe not realistic) for 30 sec to 1 minute while in the stretch of a chin up position can you imagine how your back would look, and imagine what your muscles would look like, if you were eating for mass.
Just food for thought... After reading John Parillo, DC, and Hany Rambods posts, it has just really got me thinking.
If one were a strength athlete I don't think this is the best option due to muscle stiffness being a favorable attribute. But for bodybuilders this would seem to work.
I went through a period of exclusively training in the stretch position, and I think my muscles looked hard and so much more developed. To tell you the truth, I only stopped, because I was losing weight so fast, and with phil's diet grocery bills can get expensive with the appetite I had. I would add weight when possible and hold them (with proper form) for as long as possible, and I would have a cumulative amount of time for each hold for about 3-6 minutes, with maybe 3-4 breaks in between. I did actually try to stretch even deeper by using antagonist muscles to push/pull me deeper. My strength stayed about the same, maybe a little stronger, but power definitely increased. I felt very fast.
I'm not saying this is an optimal way to train, there are so many great programs out there. But say if you were able to hold 400 lbs one your back (maybe not realistic) for 30 sec to 1 minute while in the stretch of a chin up position can you imagine how your back would look, and imagine what your muscles would look like, if you were eating for mass.
Just food for thought... After reading John Parillo, DC, and Hany Rambods posts, it has just really got me thinking.
Last edited: