Tren gyno is not caused by estrogen, but by prolactin, blocking estrogen at the receptor or in production will do nothing. You need to get some bromo or Vitamin B-5.
Bromo/cabergoline is fine for prolactin build-up now what?
B-5? Not B6? Someone is hyping B5 for acne...
KillerStack link is very informative and hard science, all is explained there...It's a MUST read.
It's so easy to understand new thing that we don't know doing a simple google search and reading...
For example in this case, look for "progesterone trenbolone" in google first result will give you that....simple to assimil information:
**broken link removed**
........................................................................................
...
This has often lead to the belief that trenbolone causes gyno and other estrogenic effects, but that simply isn't true.
This belief has taken on a life of its own though. Making theories pop up all over the place. The only one that made sense, from some point at least, was that trenbolone was progestagenic and acted at the progesterone receptor. Its structure is similar to nandrolone, so this is a logical assumption. But even then,
for progesterone activation to cause things like gyno, it needs to act as an estrogen agonist. It needs an estrogen as mediator. Since trenbolone doesn't cause aromatization, any sighting of gyno with trenbolone use should be regarded as a misinterpretation and is most likely to blame on another compound, an aromatizable one. So while trenbolone may increase the risk of gyno when stacked with heavily aromatizing substances, its simply not true that trenbolone alone causes gyno......
.....................................................................................
And from the second result:
http://www.mesomorphosis.com/articles/llewellyn/trenbolone.htm
.....................................................................................
Progestational Activity
It has been reported in other bodybuilding literature that trenbolone does not exhibit any activity as a progestin in the body. I am not certain where this belief originated, as trenbolone does appear to exhibit the classic progesterone receptor binding ability that is characteristic of nandrolone and its derivatives. One study looking at the bovine uterine progesterone receptor for example found trenbolone to be a very potent binder, startlingly even more so than progesterone itself (4).
Another looking at the binding of various compounds to the androgen, estrogen, progestin, mineral corticoid and glucocorticoid receptors found trenbolone to be a more potent binder of the progestin receptor than nandrolone (5), a steroid normally noted for its usual activity in this regard. What does this mean for trenbolone? I don’t think it really means that much. Trenbolone clearly doesn’t cause gyno, water retention or fat buildup, which one might attribute to estrogenic or progestational activity. So whatever slight action it does have as a progestin on paper doesn’t amount to all that much in the real world. The absence of estrogen may be a significant factor, as progesterone is believed to cause gyno by enhancing estrogen’s stimulation of mammary gland growth (6). Perhaps when trenbolone is taken with other aromatizable compounds it could affect a person’s sensitivity level to gyno and water/fat retention. This seems logical, at least in a technical sense, although admittedly I have seen no evidence to support this.
...............................................................................................
P.S.: I use to have some idea before post something, not an expert like others but not completely "lost in space"...
.gif "IP Gear")
