what do you guys think?

[tkav1980]

i want to begin a cycle in april but while im waiting i was thinking about running 250mg test e a week until i begin. along with the test e i was going to add hcg. then after my cycle in june i was going to bridge on test e again until i run another cycle in sept. the whole time i was going to run hcg. will this benefit me and if so how. and is there anything wrong with this? thanks for all your help.

 

[txeng]

Forgive me for asking this stupid question, but isn't taking test e at 250/week considered a cycle in itself. I know it's not much of a dose, but I just finished this exact same dosage for 12 weeks with excellent results. Did I not just do a cycle or did I just cruise for 3 months???

 

[tkav1980]

let me clarify, i want go into what for me in the past was a normal cycle which is alot more than only 250 mg test per week. my question was really do you think starting out with a lower dosage then moving it up is a good idea or even useful at all versus just simply doing it the way i usually do. i was thinking that maybe by giving my body time to gain some weight slowly on a lower dosage and maintaining that weight for a bit might help me get better results when the dosage is increased and other chemicals are added. when i would up the dose it would go to 750mg test, 600 mg deca, 100 mg anadrol per day for the first 4 weeks, and then use test taper or possibly just bridge after that. is my logic flawed? has anyone else ever done anything like this with good results?

 

[shoestring]

Yes I think you will get better gains by going on for the whole year vs. doing two cycles in the year. But I also think it will be harder on your body (extended shut down & lipids etc..). Unless you are gonna make a career out of this I think staying on for a year at a time is prolly not a good choice. But if you are gonna do it the hcg sounds wise. I would pay attention to lipids & BP for sure.