- Joined
- Jul 18, 2003
- Messages
- 1,696
Dogg,
I didn't just use HIT theories indescrimantely, or without knowledge. I spent time AT Nautilus Sports Medical in 1987 working with Darden, Paterson, and Hutchins. I was one of the first competitive BB to use the SuperSlow protocol. At the same time, a pro, (it's not my place to name him) used the same exact ideas. He even followed Darden to Texas to train after Jones sold Nautilus. This protocol was a disaster for both of us - I was just dumb enough to stick with it longer than he in an effort to try and make it work.
As part of this I met Mike Mentzer, knew and communicated with him for YEARS. I knew him before his first Heavy Duty book came out. I tried ALL of his methods EXACTLY as he proposed they be done, and because of our personal relationship, was able to "pick his brain" and ask many more questions than even his paying training clients could.
The methods you've described for Cormier and Coleman DO NOT reflect HIT in the way it was proposed or taught by Jones and followers or Mentzer, so contrary to what you think, everyone does NOT train some version of HIT. Go read Jones' articles from the 60's, or Mike's Heavy Duty books I and II.
As to science, most of the outdated ideas you say science would have us follow still have been long since refuted in numerous studies.
I certainly can not say anything about anyone else's results. What i CAN say is how these HIT ideas, AS PRESENTED BY JONES AND MENTZER (as well as their clones such as Hutchins and Darden) have failed to work for me, any of my clients (100's), and of the people I've talked to online (when I did consulting - also 100's), and at least one ver accomplished pro who's carer was almost destroyed!
This is not a personal attack, just a statement of my experience over the 17+ years I've been acquainted with this training philosophy.
I didn't just use HIT theories indescrimantely, or without knowledge. I spent time AT Nautilus Sports Medical in 1987 working with Darden, Paterson, and Hutchins. I was one of the first competitive BB to use the SuperSlow protocol. At the same time, a pro, (it's not my place to name him) used the same exact ideas. He even followed Darden to Texas to train after Jones sold Nautilus. This protocol was a disaster for both of us - I was just dumb enough to stick with it longer than he in an effort to try and make it work.
As part of this I met Mike Mentzer, knew and communicated with him for YEARS. I knew him before his first Heavy Duty book came out. I tried ALL of his methods EXACTLY as he proposed they be done, and because of our personal relationship, was able to "pick his brain" and ask many more questions than even his paying training clients could.
The methods you've described for Cormier and Coleman DO NOT reflect HIT in the way it was proposed or taught by Jones and followers or Mentzer, so contrary to what you think, everyone does NOT train some version of HIT. Go read Jones' articles from the 60's, or Mike's Heavy Duty books I and II.
As to science, most of the outdated ideas you say science would have us follow still have been long since refuted in numerous studies.
I certainly can not say anything about anyone else's results. What i CAN say is how these HIT ideas, AS PRESENTED BY JONES AND MENTZER (as well as their clones such as Hutchins and Darden) have failed to work for me, any of my clients (100's), and of the people I've talked to online (when I did consulting - also 100's), and at least one ver accomplished pro who's carer was almost destroyed!
This is not a personal attack, just a statement of my experience over the 17+ years I've been acquainted with this training philosophy.