Abstract
Micro and nanoresonators have been studied extensively both for the scientific viewpoint to understand basic interactions at small scales as well as for applied research to build sensors and mechanical signal processors. Majority of the resonant microsystems, particularly those manufactured at a large scale, have employed simple mechanical structures with one dominant resonant mode, such as in timing resonators, or linearly coupled resonant modes, as in vibratory gyroscopes. There is an increasing interest in the development of models and methods to better understand the nonlinear interactions at micro and nanoscales and also to potentially improve the performance of the existing devices in the market beyond limits permissible by the linear effects. Internal resonance is a phenomenon that allows for nonlinear coupling and energy transfer between different vibration modes of a properly designed system. Herein, for the first time, we describe and experimentally demonstrate the potential for employing internal resonance for detection of angular rate signals, where the Coriolis effect modifies the energy coupling between the distinct drive and sense vibration modes. In doing so, in addition to providing a robust method of exciting the desired mode, the proposed approach further alleviates the modematching requirements and reduces instabilities due to the crosscoupling between the modes in current linear vibratory gyroscopes.
Introduction
Micro and nanofabricated resonators are used in numerous applications including timing and frequency references, filters, chemical sensing, and physical sensing. Smallamplitude dynamics of these systems are typically studied using wellestablished methods such as EulerBernoulli theory for oscillating beams^{1}. Various phenomena such as largeamplitude operation^{2} and material nonlinearities^{3} can cause a device response to deviate from linear predictions. In typical microsystem applications, such nonlinear effects are often avoided. Over the past decade, there has been growing interest in developing design methodologies for microsystems that exhibit different types of nonlinearities for basic research^{4,5,6,7,8} and in employing nonlinearities to improve the performance of micro and nanoresonant systems, for instance, to improve the sensitivity of sensors^{9,10} or the stability of timing references^{11}. Internal resonance is a particular nonlinear phenomenon that can cause nonlinear modal interactions between vibration modes directly excited by external harmonic forces and other vibration modes. Internal resonance may occur when the linear natural frequencies of a system are commensurate or nearly commensurate (e.g., ω_{2} = kω_{1} or ω_{2} ≈ kω_{1} where k = 2, 3, …) and there exist nonlinear coupling terms between the vibration modes^{12}. Internal resonance has been studied from different perspectives because of the interesting dynamic properties. Consider a two degreeoffreedom (DOF) system where the equations of motion are:
where the first equation represents the externally excited mode through input force \(F\,\cos ({{\rm{\Omega }}}_{r}t+{{\rm{\Phi }}}_{1})\) and the second equation represents the indirectly excited subsystem. Parameters γ_{1} and γ_{2} are the damping coefficients while ω_{1} and ω_{2} are the natural frequencies of the undamped linear oscillators for the vibrational modes, respectively. Functions f(x, y) and g(x, y) represent the coupling between the two modes. In linear Coriolis vibratory gyroscopes (CVGs), for instance, these functions will be antisymmetric (i.e., f(x, y) = −g(x, y) and \(f(x,y)\propto m\dot{y}{\rm{\Omega }}\). Nonlinear 2:1 internal resonance occurs as a result of quadratic nonlinearities present in the system when Ω_{r} ≈ ω_{1}, ω_{1} ≈ 2ω_{2}, \(f(x,y)={\dot{y}}^{2}\) and \(g(x,y)=2\dot{x}\dot{y}\). In this case, the nonlinear quadratic coupling terms lead to autoparametric excitation of the lowerfrequency mode by the higherfrequency mode^{13}. In other words, the vibration energy from the mode with a higher natural frequency is pumped into the mode of lower natural frequency. The amount of energy that is transferred depends on the type of quadratic nonlinearities, the amplitude of external force, modal Qfactors, and the frequency ratio between the vibrational modes, among others^{8}. An interesting characteristic of internally resonant systems with 2:1 frequency ratio in the presence of quadratic coupling nonlinearities is saturation. When the system is excited at a frequency near the higher natural frequency, the structure responds to the frequency of excitation, and the amplitude of the response increases linearly with the amplitude of excitation^{13}. However, when the vibrational amplitude of this mode reaches a threshold value, it saturates and the additional energy from the input source is transferred to the lower natural frequency mode due to the nonlinear coupling between them. The mode with the lower resonant frequency then starts to oscillate at half the excitation frequency and its amplitude grows proportional to the spillover energy from the mode directly excited by the input. In macrosystems, internal resonance has been mainly studied to better understand the modal interactions with the intention of suppressing unwanted vibrations^{14,15,16}. However, practical applications of internal resonance at micro and nanoscales have remained limited to basic demonstrations of the phenomena^{8,17}, taking advantage of the saturation phenomenon for amplitude and frequency stabilization^{11}, and exploiting the phenomenon for masssensing^{18}.
An application area that requires two coupled resonators and can potentially benefit from internal resonance is the measurement of angular rate. Gyroscopes made using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technologies are used increasingly in applications ranging from navigation and robotics to stability control due to their small size, low power consumption and low cost. Many MEMS gyroscopes operate based on Coriolis effect where the Coriolis acceleration couples two structural modes of vibration (i.e., sense and drive) dynamically. To maximize the sensitivity of MEMS Coriolis vibratory gyroscopes (CVGs), the natural frequencies of the sense and drive modes are designed to match. However, perfect matching between these modes is challenging because of the manufacturing nonidealities and tolerances. Moreover, maintaining the frequency matching during the operation of the gyroscope usually is not possible since parameter fluctuations under operating conditions may induce further mistuning. Proposed solutions for modematching include postprocessing techniques^{19}, active electronic control systems^{20}, and structural design improvements^{21}. Inherent robustness may be achieved by widening the bandwidth of the sense mode through linear coupling of vibration modes^{22}. The amount of frequency split can be tuned using voltage signals^{23}. Calculation of the required excitation signals can be carried through, for instance, statistical learning methods for the automatic modematching circuit and elimination of the frequency split^{24}. It has also been proposed that by employing parametric resonance, the resonance frequency of the drive mode can be varied as needed until the sense mode is excited^{25}.
In this work, we are proposing a fundamentally different approach to improve the robustness of a MEMS gyroscope response to design parameter variations. The proposed design exploits the 2:1 internal resonance within a microresonator with 2 DOF such that the sense mode bandwidth is widened to the extent to circumvent the requirement for mode matching. The phenomenon is selfinitiating once the excitation amplitude exceeds a threshold level without a need for a controller, electrostatic tuning, or additional DOF.
Results
Device design
The device utilises twin proof masses that are mechanically connected to two crossbar suspensions forming a tuning fork type resonator as shown in Fig. 1. Slender flexural beams are used for the connections between the device components and to the substrate. The device is excited by applying input voltages to the two parallel plate drive electrodes (DE) 1 and 2 to exert an electrostatic force onto the structure. Movements of the structure are measured using a combination of capacitive sense currents from the sense electrodes (SE) 1–4. Under small forces, the device remains linear with two separate modes. With an adequately large driving force, the microresonator behaves a springpendulum mechanism with quadratic nonlinearities (see the Supplementary Information attachment on modeling of the system)^{26}. Nonlinearities at small scales can stem from structural, electrostatic, and material origins. In this particular case, large displacements will result in quadratic nonlinearities due to the combined linear and angular movements of the structural components. The twin proof masses can move in the radial direction (spring mode) or rotate about the anchor (pendulum mode), simultaneously. Under these conditions, there can be a nonlinear coupling of vibration energy from the forced vibrations along the spring direction to the pendulum mode through 2:1 internal resonance because of the inherent quadratic nonlinearities in the system. Taking into account the quadratic Coriolis and centripetal nonlinearities, the system can be modeled using different methods, including the perturbation method (see the Supplementary Information attachment)^{27}. The designed microdevice prioritizes antiphase resonant modes such that the natural frequency of the antiphase resonant mode along the xaxis (spring mode) is twice the frequency of the antiphase resonant mode along the yaxis (pendulum mode). The fabricated device is vacuum sealed through a hermetic, waferlevel process before dicing.
Linear response characterisation
The natural frequencies of the microresonator (f_{s} and f_{p}) and the quality factors (Q_{s} and Q_{p}) for the spring and pendulum modes are measured using the testbed shown in Fig. 2a. A vector network analyzer was used to measure the device response at the frequency of the input signal. A DC bias voltage is used to enhance the linear component of the input electrostatic force. Measured spectra around the spring and pendulum mode frequencies at the onset of nonlinearities are shown in Fig. 2b,c, respectively. For the device studied here, f_{p} = 560.28 kHz with Q_{p} = 6900 (pendulum mode) and f_{s} = 1122.35 kHz with Q_{s} = 5700 (spring mode), leading to a frequency ratio between spring and pendulum modes of f_{s}/f_{p} = 2.003 ≈ 2.
2:1 Internal resonance
The nonlinear mode coupling caused by the 2:1 internal resonance is evaluated through the saturation figure and the nonlinear frequency response curves. The configuration in Fig. 3a was employed for these experiments where an AC voltage from a signal generator was superimposed on a DC voltage and used to produce the electrostatic input force. Output current due to the capacitance changes at the sense electrodes was differentially measured and monitored on a signal analyzer to allow for simultaneous monitoring of different portions of the spectrum. The intended 2:1 internal resonance and nonlinear mode coupling were examined through several experiments. Figure 3b demonstrates the halforder subharmonic response of the sense (i.e., pendulum) mode of the device as the drive voltage amplitude is increased and the frequency of excitation is fixed at Ω_{r} = 1120.45 kHz ≈ 2f_{p}. As can be seen, the amplitude of the sense mode (i.e., pendulum mode) is negligible for drive voltage of less than V_{ac} ≤ ~1 V. However, once past this threshold voltage, the drive mode saturates and the additional energy is transferred to the sense mode for V_{ac} will result in more separation between the peaks. Figure 3c shows the nonlinear frequency response curves of the sense mode (i.e., pendulum mode) for three different actuation voltages. Despite the actuation of the system at the excitation frequency in the vicinity of the springmode resonant frequency, the pendulum mode responds at half the excitation frequency. As the electrostatic voltage is increased, the microresonator exhibit increasing nonlinear mode coupling, where the vibrational amplitude splits and two peaks of the vibrational deflection emerge in the vicinity of the pendulummode resonant frequency. Further increasing of the drive voltage, V_{ac}, will result in additional separation between the peaks.
Response to angular rate
For performance evaluation as a rate sensor, the overlap between the forward and backward sweeps, as shown in Fig. 4, was selected as a robust region for applying the input force. To operate the sensor in this region, the frequency of the drive signal needs to be about twice some frequency in this band, eliminating the need for precise frequency control and providing a robust method for device excitation.
To assess the scale factor (i.e., sensitivity) of device to input angular rate, the setup illustrated in Fig. 5 was used. The device chip was mounted inside a ceramic package and affixed to a printed circuit board (PCB). The PCB was then securely put on a rate table with a transresistance amplifier as shown in Fig. 6. The excitation signal was produced by a lockin amplifier and passed through a frequency doubler before application to the sensor to excite the drive mode. Vibrations at the sense mode were detected by differential amplification of the currents from the sense electrodes and removing the interference from the excitation signal using a notch filter. The atrest output spectrum of the microdevice is shown in Fig. 7a, confirming the activation of the nonlinear mode coupling due to the 2:1 internal resonance. Rate signals in the range of ±360 deg + sec^{−1} were applied to the device using the ratetable controller. Figure 7b shows the calibration curve obtained for different constant angular rates on the rate table and observing the corresponding output voltages of the microresonator. The xaxis in the figure represents the reference signal read from the ratetable controller while the yaxis represents the difference between the output current in response to the input rate and the atrest signal from the resonator. Due to the quadratic nature of the nonlinearities in 2:1 internal resonance, the direction of the rate signal needs to be obtained from inertial signals. As seen in Fig. 7b, the microresonator demonstrates a sensitivity of 110 fA/(deg + sec^{−1}) over a measurement range of approximately ±220 deg + sec^{−1} with a DC bias voltage of 80 V. At higher rates, the microresonator output exhibits reduced sensitivity to the input. This is likely due to the effect of centrifugal force on the device response which results in the detuning of mode frequency ratio, and hence, affecting the efficiency of energy exchange between the drive and sense modes.
Discussion
There has been a significant level of interest in understanding the nonlinear dynamics of micro and nanostructures. Except for the basic research efforts on the nonlinear phenomena, the understanding of nonlinearities was deemed necessary in order to devise methods to avoid them in practical applications. Herein, we presented a proofofconcept design for a nonlinear rate microsensor that employs 2:1 internal resonance for its operation. In contrast to the typical designs for Coriolis vibratory gyroscopes with linearly coupled drive and sense modes, utilisation of internal resonance provides a robust means for excitation of the resonator over a range of input frequencies. For instance, in Fig. 4 it can be seen that the two vibration modes are coupled to each other effectively where the sense amplitude changes from about ~0.75 mV to ~2 mV over a sense frequency range of 559.5 kHz to 561.5 kHz. In case of a linear CVG with a resonant frequency of 561 kHz and similar quality factor of 4000, a 1 kHz deviation of drive signal would result in a drop in signal amplitude of ~14×. For this reason, the nonlinear operation scheme to a great extent alleviates the modetuning requirements for the drive and sense modes of the device. Additionally, the nonlinear operation of the device results in separation of the electrical drive and sense signals in the frequency domain, potentially simplifying the signal processing by removing direct interference between them. On the other hand, the nonlinear operation reduces the linear crosscoupling between the drive and sense directions that degrade the performance of linearlycoupled CVGs. This is specifically due to the fact that the linear crosscoupling terms will not force the system to resonate due to 2:1 frequency ratio between the spring and pendulum modes. Furthermore, their effect is negligible when compared to the quadratic couplings in the system.
As the first structural design to demonstrate the concept, the device offered a sensitivity of 110 fA/(deg + sec^{−1}). The device sensitivity can improve, for example, by increasing the proofmasses used for the resonators. It is also possible to improve the device performance metrics such as sensitivity, dynamic range, and bandwidth through nonlinear closedloop control. Further research will be needed to explore the limits of operation regarding noise performance or longterm stability of device response.
Methods
Fabrication process
The microresonator was fabricated through the MEMS Integrated Design for Inertial Sensors (MIDIS) process offered by Teledyne DALSA Inc.^{13}. The MIDIS process is based on high aspectratio, bulk micromachining of a 30 μm thick singlecrystal silicon wafer (device layer) that is sandwiched between two other silicon wafers (top interconnect and bottom handle wafers). The device can be either be vacuum encapsulated at 10 mTorr or held at a subatmospheric pressure of 150 Torr. The top silicon wafer includes Through Silicon Vias (TSV) with sealed anchors for compact flipchip integration and interconnection with external microelectronic signal processing circuitry^{28}. The encapsulation of vibrational inertial MEMS resonators at low pressures influences their quality factor and response time^{28,29}. Figure 1a shows the topview, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) image of the fabricated device before encapsulation with the top wafer. The dimensions of the fabricated device are L_{a} = 165 m, w_{a} = 8 m, L_{c} = 76 m, L_{tf} = 72 m, w_{tf} = 25 m, w_{1} = 29 m, h_{1} = 60 m, w_{2} = 35 m, h_{2} = 201 m, l_{1} = 194 m, l_{2} = 197 m, g = 1.75 μm, to achieve the approximate 2:1 ratio between the modes (Fig. 1b).
Frequency domain characterisation
The measurement setup in Fig. 2a comprises (1) the vacuum encapsulated microresonator chip; (2) a DC power source (Keysight B2901A) to produce V_{DC}; (3) a vector network analyzer (Rohde & Schwarz ZVB4) to produce \({V}_{ac}\,\cos ({{\rm{\Omega }}}_{r}t)\); (4) a signal combiner/splitter (MiniCircuits ZFSCJ22S); and (5) a transimpedance amplifier (Zurich Instruments HF2TA) with a gain of G_{amp}. In this figure, the signals Y_{1} and Y_{2} are the currents produced due to capacitance changes between the stationary sense electrodes SE2 and SE4 and the crossbars of the resonator. The setting to determine the natural frequencies and the Qfactors were V_{DC} = 100 V, V_{ac} = 1 V, and G_{amp} = 1 kΩ.
The nonlinear frequency measurement setup in Fig. 3a includes (1) the vacuum encapsulated microresonator chip; (2) a DC power source (Keysight B2901A) to produce V_{DC}; (3) a function generator (Agilent Technologies 81150A) to produce V_{ac}; (4) a signal combiner/splitter (MiniCircuits ZFSCJ22S); (5) a transimpedance amplifier (Zurich Instruments HF2TA) with a gain of G_{amp}; and (6) a signal analyzer (Agilent Technologies N9000A) to monitor the sensed signals in the frequency domain. For these tests, we set V_{DC} = 100 V, V_{ac} = 0–4.5 V, and G_{amp} = 10 kΩ. The drive frequency of the electrostatic voltage is then swept forward and backward around the spring mode frequency while monitoring the frequency response of the sense mode (pendulum mode).
Sensitivity characterisation
The linearity, fullscale range, and response of the microresonator to the input rotation rate are extracted from the data obtained through the scale factor tests using a high precision rate table (Ideal Aerosmith 1621200ATL with AERO 812 controller). The schematic of the setup for the rate measurement is shown in Fig. 5. The microresonator is mounted on a PCB and securely placed on the rate table along with a lownoise transimpedance amplifier (FEMTO DHPCA100). A lockin amplifier (Zurich Instruments HF2LI) was used to produce the excitation voltage and record the measured signals. While the lockin amplifier could detect higher harmonics of the excitation signal, it is unable to capture subharmonics. On the other hand, the nonlinear transformation of the excitation signal from the frequency f_{s} to \({f}_{p}\approx {f}_{s}/2\) meant that the sense signal is roughly at half the frequency of the excitation signal, which would have been undetectable with the standard configuration. To circumvent this issue, a frequency doubler was used at the output of the lockin amplifier to produce the excitation signal which was further amplified using a voltage amplifier (TEGAM 2350), and thus, treated as the first harmonic of the reference signal produced by the lockin amplifier. The frequency doubler was designed using an analog multiplier chip (AD835) to multiply the reference signal by itself to generate its second harmonic at double the frequency. The signal at the output of the device included the sense signal at f_{p} due to the nonlinear excitation of the sense mode as well as a parasitic contribution from the drive signal at f_{s}. The interference at f_{s} was then removed using a notch filter after initial amplification of the current signal using the transimpedance amplifier. The sense signal received by the lockin amplifier was therefore at frequency f_{p}, which was about f_{s}/2.
An input rate in the form of a trapezoidal wave was then applied to the sensor such that the applied rate was increased from 0 deg + sec^{−1} to the target rate with the constant angular acceleration of 40 deg + sec^{−2}, kept constant at the intended rate for 30 s, and then decreased back to 0 deg + sec^{−1} with the constant angular acceleration of −40 deg + sec^{−2}. An accelerometer was used to determine the direction of rotation of the rate table. During the test, the output response of the microresonator is monitored and recorded. The response of the sensor is measured as the change in the amplitude of the sense signal due to the input rate.
For the sensitivity tests, we set V_{DC} = 0. 4 V at a frequency of 561. 236 kHz (before frequency doubler), a fixed gain of 20 V/V for the highvoltage amplifier, and a gain of R = 5 × 10^{7} Ω for the transimpedance amplifier. The notch filter was designed based on a passive twinT structure for a notch frequency of 1120 kHz.
References
 1.
Timoshenko, S. History of Strength of Materials. (Courier Corporation, 1983).
 2.
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Mechanics. 1, (Butterworth Heinemann, 1976).
 3.
Nitzan, S. H. et al. Selfinduced parametric amplification arising from nonlinear elastic coupling in a micromechanical resonating disk gyroscope. Scientific Reports 5, 9036 (2015).
 4.
Jia, Y., Du, S. & Seshia, A. A. TwentyEight Orders of Parametric Resonance in a Microelectromechanical Device for Multiband Vibration Energy Harvesting. Scientific Reports 6, 30167 (2016).
 5.
Villanueva, L. G. et al. A Nanoscale Parametric Feedback Oscillator. Nano Lett. 11, 5054–5059 (2011).
 6.
Zanette, D. H. Effects of noise on the internal resonance of a nonlinear oscillator. Scientific Reports 8, 5976 (2018).
 7.
Ramini, A. H., Hajjaj, A. Z. & Younis, M. I. Tunable Resonators for Nonlinear Modal Interactions. Scientific Reports 6, 34717 (2016).
 8.
Sarrafan, A., Bahreyni, B. & Golnaraghi, F. Analytical modeling and experimental verification of nonlinear mode coupling in a decoupled tuning fork microresonator. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 27, 398–406 (2018).
 9.
Kacem, N., Hentz, S., Pinto, D., Reig, B. & Nguyen, V. Nonlinear dynamics of nanomechanical beam resonators: improving the performance of NEMSbased sensors. Nanotechnology 20, 275501 (2009).
 10.
Venstra, W. J., Capener, M. J. & Elliott, S. R. Nanomechanical gas sensing with nonlinear resonant cantilevers. Nanotechnology 25, 425501 (2014).
 11.
Antonio, D., Zanette, D. H. & López, D. Frequency stabilization in nonlinear micromechanical oscillators. Nature Communications 3, 806 (2012).
 12.
Nayfeh, A. H. & Mook, D. T. Nonlinear Oscillations. (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).
 13.
Sarrafan, A., Bahreyni, B. & Golnaraghi, F. Design and characterization of microresonators simultaneously exhibiting 1/2 subharmonic and 2:1 internal resonances. In The 19th International Conference on SolidState Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems. 102–105 (2017).
 14.
Tuer, K. L., Golnaraghi, M. F. & Wang, D. Development of a generalised active vibration suppression strategy for a cantilever beam using internal resonance. Nonlinear Dyn 5, 131–151 (1994).
 15.
Ikeda, T. & Murakami, S. Autoparametric resonances in a structure/fluid interaction system carrying a cylindrical liquid tank. Journal of Sound and Vibration 285, 517–546 (2005).
 16.
Nayfeh, A. H., Mook, D. T. & Marshall, L. R. Nonlinear coupling of pitch and roll modes in ship motions. Journal of Hydronautics 7, 145–152 (1973).
 17.
Vyas, A., Peroulis, D. & Bajaj, A. K. A Microresonator Design Based on Nonlinear 1:2 Internal Resonance in Flexural Structural Modes. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 18, 744–762 (2009).
 18.
Kirkendall, C. R., Howard, D. J. & Kwon, J. W. Internal Resonance in Quartz Crystal Resonator and Mass Detection in Nonlinear Regime. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 223502 (2013).
 19.
Joachim, D. & Lin, L. Characterization of Selective Polysilicon Deposition for MEMS Resonator Tuning. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 12, 193–200 (2003).
 20.
Liu, Y. X. et al. Design of a Digital Closed Control Loop for the Sense Mode of a ModeMatching MEMS Vibratory Gyroscope. In The 9th IEEE International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS) 199–203, https://doi.org/10.1109/NEMS.2014.6908790 (2014).
 21.
Geiger, W. et al. Decoupled microgyros and the design principle DAVED. In Technical Digest. MEMS 2001. 14th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (Cat. No. 01CH37090) 170–173, https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMSYS.2001.906507 (2001).
 22.
Acar, C. & Shkel, A. M. Inherently Robust Micromachined Gyroscopes with 2DOF SenseMode Oscillator. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 15, 380–387 (2006).
 23.
Wan, Q. et al. A high symmetry polysilicon micro hemispherical resonating gyroscope with spherical electrodes. In 2017 IEEE Sensors 1–3 (2017).
 24.
He, C. et al. A MEMS Vibratory Gyroscope With RealTime ModeMatching and Robust Control for the Sense Mode. IEEE Sensors Journal 15, 2069–2077 (2015).
 25.
OropezaRamos, L. A., Burgner, C. B. & Turner, K. L. Inherently Robust Micro Gyroscope Actuated by Parametric Resonance. In 2008 IEEE 21st International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems 872–875, https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMSYS.2008.4443795 (2008).
 26.
Lee, W. K. & Hsu, C. S. A global analysis of anharmonically excited springpendulum system with internal resonance. Journal of Sound and Vibration 171, 335–359 (1994).
 27.
Nayfeh, A. H. Perturbation Methods. (John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1973).
 28.
MIDIS Platform for Motion Sensors  Teledyne DALSA Inc. Available at, http://www.teledynedalsa.com/semi/mems/applications/midis/ (Accessed: 8th February 2017).
 29.
Dienel, M. et al. On the influence of vacuum on the design and characterization of MEMS. Vacuum 86, 536–546 (2012).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for providing financial support. Access to fabrication services and simulation tools was provided through CMC Microsystems.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
A.S. and B.B. developed the initial designs and wrote the main manuscript text. S.A. designed the electrical circuit and helped A.S. with the experiments. B.B. and F.G. jointly supervised the work. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sarrafan, A., Azimi, S., Golnaraghi, F. et al. A Nonlinear Rate Microsensor utilising Internal Resonance. Sci Rep 9, 8648 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598019446693
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Controllable multichannel acoustooptic modulator and frequency synthesizer enabled by nonlinear MEMS resonator
Scientific Reports (2021)

Strong internal resonance in a nonlinear, asymmetric microbeam resonator
Microsystems & Nanoengineering (2021)

Internal resonance in the higherorder modes of a MEMS beam: experiments and global analysis
Nonlinear Dynamics (2021)

Resonant modal interactions in micro/nanomechanical structures
Nonlinear Dynamics (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.