They're everywhere even at the amature level. If people are getting paid They're probably on something. This applies to all sports BTWI just caught a clip of an upcoming national level Track and Field comp and by the look of the athletes I’m guessing very very prominent.
And working loopholes, every cyclist has asthma so they take albuteral. A lot of MMA are on HRT.I recommend Charlie Francis's book Speed Trap. he was Ben Johnson's coach. I agree with what Sickboy wrote. They tend to have very comprehensive and cutting edge doping protocols. They must avoid detection for the obvious reasons but also because it will hurt them financially (also obvious). There is a ton of ad & sponsorship money in Track & Field so getting caught might cause them to lose a deal and/or sit (suspension). Seems like the most comprehensive and advanced doping protocols are in Track & Field, cycling, and MMA or more specifically UFC (USADA).
EPO as a sprinter? Ok that’s surprising. Can you share doses and the benefits you felt it provided?Former high level collegiate sprinter here … they’re prominent as fuck lol I personally used EPO back in the day
EPO as a sprinter? Ok that’s surprising. Can you share doses and the benefits you felt it provided?
Any other compounds? Illicit or not?
Gw1516 is traceable. Along came gw7042 its been out for years but only common knowledge for a few years.I recommend Charlie Francis's book Speed Trap. he was Ben Johnson's coach. I agree with what Sickboy wrote. They tend to have very comprehensive and cutting edge doping protocols. They must avoid detection for the obvious reasons but also because it will hurt them financially (also obvious). There is a ton of ad & sponsorship money in Track & Field so getting caught might cause them to lose a deal and/or sit (suspension). Seems like the most comprehensive and advanced doping protocols are in Track & Field, cycling, and MMA or more specifically UFC (USADA).
The general pervasive thought is that it benefits long distance aerobic work because of its effect on hemoglobin and red blood cell production. In your cycling example, yes they have bursts of higher output but they're doing that over hours and days of work. But if it indeed has a positive impact on anaerobic output then I get why a sprinter would use it. I just had never read that it had that benefit. Or at least I haven't read how it imparts that benefit.Is it suprising? EPOs main benefit is prolonging anaerobic/aerobic threshold bursts ie. Cyclists hill climbing as speed, or sprinting into an overtake. At has little impact at "zone 2" or aerobic work.
I'm not arguing your contention here in the slightest. I was just asking if there was other experience you felt like sharing.PEDs are rife at the elite level of all sport - look at the number of crossfitters popped in the last month! Look at the protocol used by Tim Montgomery when he set the 100m record... I'd love to know bolt's protocol
EPO can help mildly in steady state but has more benefits in zone 4 and 5. In cycling races are won on the climbs unless it's downhill MTB. EPO allows you to stay aerobic at a higher heartrate.The general pervasive thought is that it benefits long distance aerobic work because of its effect on hemoglobin and red blood cell production. In your cycling example, yes they have bursts of higher output but they're doing that over hours and days of work. But if it indeed has a positive impact on anaerobic output then I get why a sprinter would use it. I just had never read that it had that benefit. Or at least I haven't read how it imparts that benefit.
I'm not arguing your contention here in the slightest. I was just asking if there was other experience you felt like sharing.
I’ve included Golf on that list for years.They're everywhere even at the amature level. If people are getting paid They're probably on something. This applies to all sports BTW
I’ve included Golf on that list for years.
The general pervasive thought is that it benefits long distance aerobic work because of its effect on hemoglobin and red blood cell production. In your cycling example, yes they have bursts of higher output but they're doing that over hours and days of work. But if it indeed has a positive impact on anaerobic output then I get why a sprinter would use it. I just had never read that it had that benefit. Or at least I haven't read how it imparts that benefit.
I'm not arguing your contention here in the slightest. I was just asking if there was other experience you felt like sharing.