• All new members please introduce your self here and welcome to the board:
    http://www.professionalmuscle.com/forums/showthread.php?t=259
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
M4B Store Banner
intex
Riptropin Store banner
Generation X Bodybuilding Forum
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Buy Needles And Syringes With No Prescription
Mysupps Store Banner
IP Gear Store Banner
PM-Ace-Labs
Ganabol Store Banner
Spend $100 and get bonus needles free at sterile syringes
Professional Muscle Store open now
sunrise2
PHARMAHGH1
kinglab
ganabol2
Professional Muscle Store open now
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
azteca
granabolic1
napsgear-210x65
esquel
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
ashp210
UGFREAK-banner-PM
1-SWEDISH-PEPTIDE-CO
YMSApril21065
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
advertise1
tjk
advertise1
advertise1
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store
over 5000 supplements on sale at professional muscle store

Anti Cancer Diet cuz I am motivated now....

So, if one already has cancer they should not use glutathione?

not necessarily.

it depends on lots of things, the type of cancer, the whole situation.

i feel blanket statements in an area like this can be dangerous, some things might be great in general and for most applications but in trying to get rid of cancer like for real using alternative methods or combination therapy we have to try and consider all variables.

some cancer could respond to exo glut, it might not too in reality we have very little clinical evidence of the real world effects of these compounds.

its very experimental.
 
Personally i think there is a direct correlation from what i have read. I know all most every person i have ever read about or talked to, that dramatically lowered their carb intake, saw immediate health benefits in everything from weight loss to much better blood tests. But for every report you read that says it works, there are others that say it doesn't. But since tons of reports in this world are funded by under the table interests, that want to see a specific outcomes, i don't put much faith in any of them. I like to hear and read about real world results. I do know one thing though. We are seeing more and more evidence that health benefits increase when carbs are decreased. Just my 2 cents.

Thanks for the input. I haven't studied the topic enough to have a strong opinion one way or the other. Personally I feel better on higher carbs but that doesn't necessarily have anything to do with longevity, people feel pretty good on tren too.

This is not very scientific but I thought it was an interesting read nonetheless Are Low Carb Diets Over-rated for Health and Longevity? The Kitavan and Okinawa Diets. : The IF Life. Quote from the article:

When it comes to carbs, it is the source that seems to be of vital importance for health and longevity (which includes obesity that can come from a malfunctioning glucose metabolism). We have seen healthy societies with various %s (high and low) of carb intake but they all have one big thing in common…..they all eat natural “real foods”.
 
What are the things we should look for/dread seeing on these tests? I hate the water where I live but that's because it's "hard".

They need to have heavy metals, pesticides, herbacides , medications.
 
not sure if I said it earlier but I don't plan on taking very many supps. this is more about eating anti cancer DIET not pushing pills all day. as it stands I don't take any supplements not even a multi vitamin.
currently getting all nutrition from fruits, veggies, farm eggs, organic grass fed beef, wild caught fish etc... I haven't decided if I will take supplements. I am lucky if I remember to take my blood pressure meds lol. (I bet this diet and change in lifestyle will terminate the need for even a bp supplement)
-JS

Bingo! Eating clean is the answer here. I read these guys going on about dieting and "bulking" lol. It all falls under clean eating. I've been eating clean all my life. I keep my fiber and protein high. But that's just the way I like to eat.

JS, eating clean will help tremendously in the long run. Long run. But this can't be a binge, it's got to be a full blow commitment to a way of life.

Hey man, I feel terrible for your friend. But this kind of thing can happen to anyone unfortunately. It could have happened no matter how clean he was eating. I feel eating clean will help put the odds in your favor. But it falls well short of the cure.

CG
 
I agree brother. Eating healthy is a great thing. But small children and babies having cancer should tell us that the genetic factor is huge in those cases.

Eating healthy prevents so many other "diseases",(diabetes, high blood pressure, gastrointestinal problems, etc) it's just the smart thing to do.

Genetics may make us prone to getting cancer, but it is the things we put into our bodies--the food, drugs, water, and air we breath--that is the cause.

You mention small children and babies being afflicted with cancer as evidence of a genetic link, but think about the following facts. Cancer is a recent development. Prior to the destruction of our food supply, the production of drugs, and pollution of our air and water, cancer was basically NON-EXISTENT among all of humanity! It is only within the last couple hundred years that it began to rear its ugly head--particularly over the last 100 years.

Why do you think this is? If genetics were the cause, how come no one had cancer for the first 7,000 years of recorded human history? It was very, very rare.

Our genetics make us more or less susceptible to the influence of these cancer causing factors. They don't cause it. Cancer is self-inflicted whether we realize the cause or not. Remove the cause and remove the cancer.
 
^ Same with Autism.
Preach brother preach.

You may be more susceptible to acquisition of these disease processes than others.. But it doesn't deny the fact we are the source and reason for inflicting the damage upon ourselves (in most cases)
 
Bingo! Eating clean is the answer here. I read these guys going on about dieting and "bulking" lol. It all falls under clean eating. I've been eating clean all my life. I keep my fiber and protein high. But that's just the way I like to eat.

JS, eating clean will help tremendously in the long run. Long run. But this can't be a binge, it's got to be a full blow commitment to a way of life.

Hey man, I feel terrible for your friend. But this kind of thing can happen to anyone unfortunately. It could have happened no matter how clean he was eating. I feel eating clean will help put the odds in your favor. But it falls well short of the cure.

CG

CG,
I really only ate "clean" when dieting and competing (haven't competed in few years). but even then when competing i only ate clean for diets and on offseason would eat fairly clean on weekdays and just enjoy myself on weekends. BUT like i said it wasn't really what i now call "clean". Those meats and fruits and veggies were all full of hormones and chemicals and covered in pesticides and preservatives.... I am over that. not gonna put it in my body in more.
i am def in for life bro.
its been fun to find new ways to cook and how to buy food at the Farmers Market etc.

tomo i have a doc appt to review the sonogram of the "growth" they found in my leg. i doubt its cancerous but just the thought that it could be makes me lil uneasy... especially with what my friend is going thru and others on this board have gone thru and are going thru.
-JS
 
Last edited:
Genetics may make us prone to getting cancer, but it is the things we put into our bodies--the food, drugs, water, and air we breath--that is the cause.

You mention small children and babies being afflicted with cancer as evidence of a genetic link, but think about the following facts. Cancer is a recent development. Prior to the destruction of our food supply, the production of drugs, and pollution of our air and water, cancer was basically NON-EXISTENT among all of humanity! It is only within the last couple hundred years that it began to rear its ugly head--particularly over the last 100 years.

Why do you think this is? If genetics were the cause, how come no one had cancer for the first 7,000 years of recorded human history? It was very, very rare.

Our genetics make us more or less susceptible to the influence of these cancer causing factors. They don't cause it. Cancer is self-inflicted whether we realize the cause or not. Remove the cause and remove the cancer.

YES, THIS!!!!^^^
-JS
 
It's a third party test, has to be done, needs to be available to the public.

Your looking for heavy metals, pesticides, and medications mainly.

I gotcha, I still stand its all bad and needs to be filtered
 
Genetics may make us prone to getting cancer, but it is the things we put into our bodies--the food, drugs, water, and air we breath--that is the cause.

You mention small children and babies being afflicted with cancer as evidence of a genetic link, but think about the following facts. Cancer is a recent development. Prior to the destruction of our food supply, the production of drugs, and pollution of our air and water, cancer was basically NON-EXISTENT among all of humanity! It is only within the last couple hundred years that it began to rear its ugly head--particularly over the last 100 years.

Why do you think this is? If genetics were the cause, how come no one had cancer for the first 7,000 years of recorded human history? It was very, very rare.

Our genetics make us more or less susceptible to the influence of these cancer causing factors. They don't cause it. Cancer is self-inflicted whether we realize the cause or not. Remove the cause and remove the cancer.

most scientists studying genetics feel they are less then 15% responsible for most things relating to health and disease prevention.

Mike is on point here.

also remember our internal chemical is closely related to thought process and mental environment, we can create a negative or toxic environment simply through thought.

I actually spent some time talking with a guy that had a cancer magazine that was all about natural treatments, they went way into this part, he also wrote a couple books about it and had cancer and recovered.
 
Genetics may make us prone to getting cancer, but it is the things we put into our bodies--the food, drugs, water, and air we breath--that is the cause.



You mention small children and babies being afflicted with cancer as evidence of a genetic link, but think about the following facts. Cancer is a recent development. Prior to the destruction of our food supply, the production of drugs, and pollution of our air and water, cancer was basically NON-EXISTENT among all of humanity! It is only within the last couple hundred years that it began to rear its ugly head--particularly over the last 100 years.



Why do you think this is? If genetics were the cause, how come no one had cancer for the first 7,000 years of recorded human history? It was very, very rare.



Our genetics make us more or less susceptible to the influence of these cancer causing factors. They don't cause it. Cancer is self-inflicted whether we realize the cause or not. Remove the cause and remove the cancer.


I respectfully disagree

I believe cancer was just as prevalent in the beginning of time as it is now, we are just far enough advanced to know what we are looking at and label it as cancer, and we are living longer. The biggest risk factor for cancer is old age, if you live long enough you WILL eventually have some form or variation. I am not stating that it does not have an environmental aspect, because there are definitely teratogens and cancer contributing elements present everywhere we go

Same goes for this Autism argument, this label is what we are giving the children we just thought were "weird" years ago. Also, we are now open minded to the fact that we need to give someone a label and try to work around their defect than just expect them to conform.
 
Same goes for this Autism argument, this label is what we are giving the children we just thought were "weird" years ago. Also, we are now open minded to the fact that we need to give someone a label and try to work around their defect than just expect them to conform.

I am extremely well versed on this.
I can tell you right now: you are so wrong about this. It is almost laughable for me to even read comments like this.

Not going to spend my time debating this topic because it could end up being a 100page thread that I don't have the mind-energy for.But yeah brother, you are very very very wrong about the Autism thing at the very least.

You're right...we now have "labels" for everything even if we don't know what it is. We are better at identifying trends,patterns,behaviors,physiological factors and then categorizing an individual's diagnosis. This is absolutely NOT why there are more cases of autism now. Autism has EXPLODED. The eruption in the number of cases(which is NOT only related to the fact that we can now "diagnose kids better") is clearly correlated/causated to something we are doing wrong.
 
Last edited:
I am extremely well versed on this.

I can tell you right now: you are so wrong about this. It is almost laughable for me to even read comments like this.



Not going to spend my time debating this topic because it could end up being a 100page thread that I don't have the mind-energy for.But yeah brother, you are very very very wrong about the Autism thing at the very least.



You're right...we now have "labels" for everything even if we don't know what it is. We are better at identifying trends,patterns,behaviors,physiological factors and then categorizing an individual's diagnosis. This is absolutely NOT why there are more cases of autism now. Autism has EXPLODED. The eruption in the number of cases(which is NOT only related to the fact that we can now "diagnose kids better") is clearly correlated/causated to something we are doing wrong.


You don't attribute it's "explosion" to having more open minded qualified providers in this day and age who try to integrate mentally handicapped individuals in society rather than put them into an institution if they don't learn to assimilate?

Also, the advancement in diagnostic testing, imaging, and science I general Is amazing now when compared to 20 years ago

I will conclude with an example of my uncle who in his 60's was finally diagnosed with Aspergers...as a child his IQ was tested in the clinical genius range...he went from one ambition to the other throughout his life, learning everything about anything and moving on because he didn't have the social abilities of you and I to function optimally in society, my grandfather was so embarrassed of him not being able to socially function that he basically "disowned" him

Now if this were in today's society, he would have been diagnosed as a child and have multiple programs available to help him function optimally rather than expect him to assimilate

I am in no way attacking your beliefs bro, just offering another viewpoint
 
Last edited:
your uncle, whom I have the greatest sympathy for, is a unique case. i can see why you have developed this kind of bias towards the topic at hand. there is nothing wrong with this, as we all develop biases and are biased creatures as a result of the environment(s) that we have been molded in.

however, as i stated, this is a unique case. it does not apply to the large number of children that are acquiring autism spectrum disorder.

i agreed with you : our current diagnostics allow us to figure out what kind of pathology we are dealing with on a case to case basis. we can say person X has problem Y, and person A has problem B, and then tend to their issues the best that we can. this certainly did contribute to SOME of the increased # of cases because....well ....we can actually call it "a case". if you don't know what something is, we can't label it as another case of epidemic X.

however, in the overall scheme of things, this will not cause profound contribution to the immense growth of ASD cases. the fact is: there actually is a continuous growth in the # of people that are being afflicted by ASD.
 
Last edited:
Have you missed all of my posts the last couple years? Lol!

No way I've missed them! haha. You, Dante, Stewie are bookmarked as a reference! lol. But big thanks for the list! It's a huge help having it in one place for research!

I guess my question was more about which of these supps would be not needed if our diet were more sound as in Johnny Smiles' case.

For example, my diet is not really varied. "Healthy" I guess, no junk, but Im guessing deficient in everything but Protein carbs and fats. haha.
 
Last edited:
And now for the real facts.


History of cancer from MedicineWorld.Org

History of Cancer

From Medicineworld.org: History of cancer
Cancer MainCancer newsCancer terms 

History of Cancer

Kottapurath Kunjumoideen MD

View History of cancer PDF version

          Many believe that human cancer is probably as old as the human race. There is plenty of evidence from paleopathology to suggest that cancer appeared much before the human race appeared on this planet. Earliest evidence of cancer is found in fossilized dinosaur bone dating back to 70 million years. Researcher Bruce Rothschild and colleagues of the Northeastern Ohio University College of Medicine in Rootstown studied over 10,000 dinosaur vertebrae from 700 museums across North America. They studied several families of dinosaurs including Stegosaurus, Triceratops, Tyrannosaurus, and Hadrosaurs and found that only one family namely the Hadrosaurs, or 'duck-billed dinosaurs’ had evidence of cancer. Rothschild and colleagues found 29 tumors in bones of 97 members this group. Rothschild suggested that the food habits of these dinosaurs may have made them prone to cancer. Hadrosaurs ate conifers, which are high in carcinogenic chemicals. Identified tumors in this group included osteoblastoma, desmoplastic fibroma and metastatic cancer, however metastatic cancer was extremely rare and was found only in one specimen1.



3000 BC to 1500 BC
          Remains of the human mummies in Egypt provide the earliest evidence of human cancer. About 2250 years ago, some where in Egypt, a man today known only as M1, aged in his 50s struggled with a long, painful, progressive prostate cancer. He must have suffered from throbbing pain in his lower back, which then may have spread to other parts of his body and ultimately may have succumbed to his disease. Detailed analysis of this male Ptolemaic Egyptian mummy, from the Museu Nacional de Arqueologia (MNA) in Lisbon displayed several focal dense bone lesions located mainly on the spine, pelvis and proximal extremities. From the distribution of these osteoblastic metastatic lesions, it was hypothesized that prostate was the most likely origin of these metastatic lesions2. A type of very aggressive bone cancer namely Osteosarcoma has also been observed in Egyptian Mummies. Bony destruction suggestive of head and neck cancer were observed in some Mummies 

          It is obvious that cancer did not suddenly start appearing after modernization or industrialization. The oldest known description of human cancer is found in an Egyptian seven papyri, writing written between 3000-1500 BC. Two of them, known as the "Edwin Smith"3 and "George Ebers"4papyri, contain details of conditions that are consistent with modern descriptions of cancer. 

          Edwin Smith Papyrus is assumed to be the oldest medical literature available. Written approximately in 3000 BC, Edwin Smith Papyrus contains 48 case reports that are written on a thin roll of papyrus 15 feet long. This contains description regarding 8 cases of tumors or ulcers of the breast. The writer concluded that bulging tumor of the breast was a grave disease with no significant curative options. The Edwin Smith Papyrus recommended cauterization (the fire drill) as a palliative measure. 

          The Ebers Papyrus dated 1500 BC, describes a soft-tissue tumor, a fatty tumor and recommends that this should be excised. However, if the tumor is large or livid and on a limb, the author recommends that this be left alone untouched. The Ebers Papyrus also contains descriptions suggestive of cancers of the skin, uterus, stomach, and rectum. Additional descriptions regarding enlarged thyroids, polyps were also available in the text. In addition to description of the medical conditions, the author also describes pharmacological, mechanical, and magical treatments for these disorders. 

          The Sumerians, Chinese, Indians, Persians, and Hebrews developed their own parallel systems and introduced herbal remedies such as tea, fruit juices, figs, and boiled cabbage as treatment for cancer. The ancient Egyptian system of treatment typically mixed medicine and religion. These physicians treated patients for several forms of cancer. Hieroglyphic inscriptions and papyri manuscripts suggest that these ancient physicians were able to distinguish between benign and malignant tumors. They suggested that the surface tumors may be removed surgically much similar to the current medical practice. Compounds of barley, pig’s ear and other indigenous materials were suggested as treatment for cancer of the stomach and the uterus. Other commonly dispensed medications included ointments, enemas, castor oil, suppositories, poultices and animal parts5, 6. Most likely cancer was not a very prevalent disease in those olden days, because life expectancy was rather short and life style practices like prolonged breast feeding may have decreased the risk of breast cancer. It is worth noting that breast cancer is described more often than any other cancer in these ancient times. 

Oldest specimens of cancer
          The Kenam mandible is a jaw bone fragment found in Kenya by Louis Leakey in 1937. This is believed to be from an early hominid, estimated to have lived between 500,000 years to 1 million years ago. This specimen contained a tumor mass in the inner surface and this was often referred to the oldest specimen of cancer7. Some have suggested that this was osteogenic sarcoma, while others have argued that this could be Burkitt's lymphoma8. This mass was reexamined recently using latest techniques and the conclusion was that this was not a malignant tumor but instead was residue of a broken jaw9. The mummified skeletal remains of several Peruvian Incas, dating back 2400 years ago, contained abnormalities suggestive of malignant melanoma with diffuse metastases to bones, particularly of the skull and extremities. 

Early years
          Hippocrates, the great Greek physician (460-370 B.C), who is considered the father of medicine, is though to be the first person to clearly recognize difference between benign and malignant tumors. He is also the first person to use the terms cancer and carcinoma. Hippocrates noticed that blood vessels around a malignant tumor looked like the claws of crab. He named the disease Karakinos (the Greek name for crab) to describe tumors that may or may not progress to ulceration. His writings included description of cancers involving various parts of the human body. He used the word carcinos to describe a tumor, carcinoma to describe a malignant tumor and the word cancer to describe a non-healing malignant ulcer. Hippocrates has written extensively about diagnosis and medical treatment. His writing remained handwritten for centuries. In 1525 first Latin edition of Hippocrates writing appeared in print, and subsequently several Greek editions were published in Venice10. Hippocrates studied the natural history of various diseases and came to the conclusion that all diseases, including cancer, originate from natural causes. Hippocrates believed that imbalance between four humors (blood, phlegm, yellow bile and black bile) was the causative factor for tumors. He proposed that the non-healing ulcerated cancers arose due to excess of black bile. Hippocrates has recognized the "dark, beef glaze like vaginal discharge" in association with uterine ulceration, cancers of the skin, mouth, breast, and stomach. Hippocrates has written about breast cancer and described this as a condition with bloody discharge and recognized that this may lead the condition of blood stained intra abdominal fluid. He described anorectal condylomas and polyps in his writing and recommended use of a speculum for rectal examination if the lesion was higher up in the colon11, 12, 13. 

          Another renowned and influential Greek physician, Aulus Celsus (25 BC–AD 50) wrote, in Latin, his “De Medicina”, an encyclopedic listing of medical advances to that date. Several centuries later his written notes were printed in a book form, which is often cited as the first printed medical book. Celsus continued the Hippocratic way of thinking comparing cancer to a crab. In his book he describes several varieties of superficial cancers of face, mouth, throat, and penis. He also describes cancers of deeper organs including stomach, colon, liver, and spleen13, 14, 15, 16, 17. Celsus advocated treatment of superficial carcinomas with a topical application of boiled cabbage and a salted mixture of honey and egg white. He recommended that aggressive surgical treatment be undertaken for early cancer. He recognized that when breast cancer progresses, it tend to recur in the armpit which may lead to swelling of the arm, and in many cases may lead to death by spread to distant organs. 

          Claudius Galen (AD 129–217) is another great Greek physician who has given early description of cancer. He studied medicine at Alexandria and became one of the most famous physicians of ancient times. In Galen’s text "De Tumoribus Praeter Naturam" he gives a detailed description of tumors. He also, like Hippocrates, believed that "humoral" changes in the body are responsible for the development of cancer. He believed that thick black bile caused ulcerated and incurable cancer, whereas thin yellow bile was responsible for non-ulcerated and curable cancer. Galen has recommended no treatment for cancer, unless the cancer was involving the skin, in which case surgery was the choice of treatment. Galen proposed that cancer was a disease of the sick and should be treated with purgatives to decrease the accumulation of black bile. He is credited with creation of the term sarcoma for tumors with the appearance of raw meat. Galen has written extensively on various topics. He has written more than 100 notes on tumors and cancers alone. Handwritten copies of his writing were very popular and were distributed to various countries around the world18, 19. 

          Works of Hippocrates and Galen have been instrumental in releasing the practice of medicine from grips of superstitions and magic, and developing into a science of observation and logical reasoning. Aretaeus (AD 81-138) is credited with the first compilation of symptoms, signs and treatment of cancer of the uterus. He lived and practiced medicine in Alexandria, Egypt. He has recognized that there were two distinct forms of cancer: one was firm to the touch without ulceration and the other ulcerated and foul smelling. He wrote that both types of lesions as chronic and deadly, but the ulcerated lesions were especially bad with no hope of cure6. 

Constantinople and history of cancer
          In Europe the progress of medicine slowed down after the fall of the Roman Empire in AD 476. The great discoveries and revelations of Hippocrates and Galen spread to Constantinople and Bagdad, and these cities became prominent in the history of medicine. 

          Physicians of Constantinople continued to believe in the teachings of Hippocrates and Galen and developed the science further by their own observations. During this period, again, physicians continued to believe that cancer is caused by an excess of black bile, curable only in its earliest stages. At this time in history, intellectual headquarters of civilization spread across Constantinople, Cairo Alexandria and Athens. While this awakening was occurring in Constantinople, Europe was largely left in the darkness, where magic spells and myths ruled medical literature. Oribasius, a renowned physician, who lived Baghdad (325-403), had some interesting observations about cancer. He wrote that malignant tumors are painless most of the time. He also noted that malignant tumors were not as red as tumors arising from inflammation. He noted cutting of cancer tissue showed a scirrhous (firm) lesion mixed with coarse soft material (necrosis). Aetius (527-565), who was a royal physician in Constantinople, proposed mastectomy as a treatment of breast cancer20. Teachings of Hippocrates and Galen were translated to Arabic by Rhazes of Baghdad (860-932). Rhazes had studied malignant tumors and suggested that surgeons should not attempt to remove obstructions caused by cancer unless the cancer can be excised completely21. Albucasis (Spain: 1013-1106) is credited with introduction of surgical treatment of cancer22. 

Renaissance period
          In 1215, the Pope prohibited surgical operation asserting that this is a form of bloodshed. However, this did not stop some brave surgeons like Theodoric (1205-1296), who proposed that cancers, may invade muscle, blood vessels, and nerves. He proposed wide excision of cancer with healthy tissue around to ensure complete removal of the malignant tumor22, 23. A renowned French surgeon, Guy de Chauliac (1300-1368), wrote a chapter about cancer in his book, Chirurgia Magna. He described cancers as cold (without signs of inflammation) lesions and advocated wide surgical excision as the treatment[24. 

          During the Renaissance, beginning in the 15th century, physicians acquired greater knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the human body. This started an era, which has seen the advancement of surgery and development of rational therapies based on clinical observations. The theory that cancer is caused by excess of black bile continued to prevail through the 16th century. At this time cancer was considered incurable, however a variety of temporary measures were available including creams and pastes containing arsenic. Autopsies, performed by Harvey (1578-1657) in the 17th century, gave an insight in to the circulation system25. By about the same period Gaspare Aselli (1581-1626) discovered the lymphatic system and this led to the demise of centuries old theory that excess of black bile causes cancer26. The new theory suggested that abnormalities in the lymph and lymphatic system as the primary cause of cancer. A French physician, Claude Gendron suggested that cancer arises locally as a hard, growing mass, untreatable with drugs, and must be removed with all its "filaments"27. The discovery of microscope and further experiments by Anthony Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) added momentum to the quest for the cause of cancer. 

Eighteenth century to modern era
          In 1761, Giovanni Morgagni of Padua started the practice of doing autopsies to understand the relationship of patient’s illness to pathologic findings after death. This practice greatly helped the progress of knowledge of medicine and oncology28. Jean Astruc and chemist Bernard, two 18th century physicians conducted research to confirm or disprove then current theories related to the origin of cancer. This was the pioneering efforts in experimental oncology. Many more physicians followed their footsteps, seeking better understanding of the secrets of cancer. John Hunter (1728-1793) a famous Scottish surgeon suggested that some cancers might be cured by surgery and described methods by which we can distinguish the surgically removable tumors. He suggested that, if tumor has not encroached to the nearby tissue and was still moveable, "There is no impropriety in removing it". 

          Discovery of anesthesia in 1844 by Wells allowed surgical techniques to flourish and the classic cancer operations such as radical mastectomy were developed29. Three surgeons namely Bilroth, Handley, and Halsted spearheaded "cancer operations" designed to remove the entire tumor along with the lymph nodes in the region where the tumor was located. The surgical work advanced so rapidly that the next hundred years became known as "the century of the surgeon." With progress of surgery, surgical resection of removable tumors became a routine practice. By late19th century, with the development of better microscopes to study cancer tissues, scientists gained more knowledge about the cancer process. These studies showed that cancer cells are markedly different in appearance compared to the surrounding normal cells from which they originated. Rudolf Virchow, who is often called the founder of cellular pathology, provided the scientific basis for the modern pathological diagnosis of cancer. He described clinical course of cancer in relation with microscopic findings. This approach led to the development of modern cancer surgery. Tissues removed by the surgeons were examined under the microscope to make a precise diagnosis of cancer. By looking at the cut margin of surgical specimens the pathologist was able to tell the surgeon if the procedure had completely removed the tumor. 

          The early 20th century saw great progress in our understanding of microscopic structure and functioning of the living cells. Researchers pursued different theories to the origin of cancer, subjecting their hypotheses to systematic research and experimentation. A virus causing cancer in chickens was identified in 1911. Many chemical and physical agents that may lead to development of cancer were identified during later part of the 20th century. Later part of the 20th century also witnessed tremendous improvement in our understanding of the cellular mechanisms related to cell growth and division.

Many factors that suppress and activate the cell growth and division were identified and the knowledge continues to grow. 

History of chemotherapy for cancer
          Earliest documents indicate that various natural remedies were used for treatment of cancer. Medications including ointments, pastes, plasters, powders, aromatic water, wine and medicated herbal solutions were used in ancient times. Herbal products were the main ingredients of early cancer treatments, but minerals and animal products like liver, bone and urine were also used in treatment. 

          Pliny (AD 23-79) prescribed simple remedies (like cabbage juice) for the treatment of cancer. For oral use he developed a boiled mixture of ash of sea crabs, egg white, honey, and stinging nettle with salt30. Celsus prescribed diet, medications and surgery for cancer. Galen proposed that cancer may be treated with compound natural herbal remedies15. Paulus of Aegina (625–690), an eminent Greek physician, proposed mandrake as a form of cancer treatment. Mandrake is a plant with split roots. It resembled the body and legs of a man and was believed to possess magical properties including ability to cure cancer31. Purgatives and paregoric remedies containing arsenic, camphor, licorice, honey, alcohol, and boiled viper’s flesh were often used in Medieval Europe for the treatment of cancer and cancer related wasting13. Paracelsus (1493-1541), a physician from Switzerland introduced many chemicals including mercury, lead, sulfur, iron, zinc, copper, arsenic, iodine, and potassium for the treatment of various illnesses. He believed that gradually increasing doses of chemicals can be used as chemotherapy treatment for cancer32. 

          During later periods, various chemicals including mercury and arsenic were used as external and internal treatment for cancerous lesions. It was believed that use of iodine would help to prevent progression of breast cancer beyond the primary site33, 34. Etmullerus in 1712 compiled a collection of available treatments for various illnesses and in this there are several references to treatment of cancer. In these descriptions of Tinctura vitriolata and crab’s eye are mentioned as beneficial for treatment of cancer35. Motherby’s Medical Dictionary, published in 1791, recognized that cancer is incurable and recommended palliative treatment using vinegar, crow’s foot, dogfennel, or arsenic36. In and around 1850s belladonna plaster and mercurial soap gained prominence as curative treatment of breast cancer37, 38. The first clinical trial in the history of medicine was conducted in 1857 at Middlesex Hospital in London to compare the results of medical treatment to surgical treatment23. The clinical trial ended without any clear cut conclusions to superiority of one modality of treatment over the other. 

          Ehrlich is credited with introduction of the term “chemotherapy”. In its early days the term was used for the practice of using chemicals like arsenic to treat syphilis. Ehrlich published a paper in 1891 describing staining methods to differentiate lymphoid and myeloid cells and first described the term myeloid leukemia39. During this period Ehrlich was doing research hoping to develop chemotherapy drugs for cancer. He was working with various chemical compounds including paramidobenzol, phenylarsenoxyl, diamidoarsenobenzol, and pyocyanase for treatment of cancer. In 1909 Ehrlich summarized his own findings and cotemporary knowledge in a 247 page book, which is often referred to as the first book of chemotherapy for cancer40. In 1896 Roentgen discovered X-ray and within the next few years radiation found its place in the treatment of cancer. It was later discovered that daily low doses of radiation spread over several weeks greatly improved the patient’s chance for a cure of cancer. This finding paved the path for development of modern radiation therapy, which is now far more complex in efficiency and precision. Development of radiation therapy, in addition to development of newer chemical compounds added further momentum to the cancer treatment. 

          Trysin and amylopsin were introduced in 1921, which is considered to be starting point of modern chemotherapy. Based on experiences in World War I and then an accident in World War II with mustard gas scientists concluded that this could be used as an anti-cancer agent. Examination of victims who died from exposure to Nitrogen mustard showed that many had atrophy of their bone marrow and lymph nodes. This observation lead to the introduction of Mustard gas in to the treatment of a group of hematological malignancies called lymphoma, or cancers of the lymph glands. Alfred Gilman and Gustaf Lindskog used this drug in an animal model of lymphoma and found that it actually worked. This drug was first tried on a patient by name Dr. Lindskog, who was having trouble breathing because of a large lymphoma tumor mass in his neck. The drug worked and the patient had a very dramatic response. Publication of this finding was delayed due to military secrets involved with Nitrogen mustard. Lindskog finally published his findings in 1946. Initially there was a real enthusiasm in the oncology field, however it soon gave away to despair and pessimism with the finding that the response to Nitrogen mustard is only short lived and incomplete. Many acclaimed physicians including famous hematologist William Dameshek, were so much disappointed by the apparent set back that they became harsh critics of national drug development program arguing that cancer could never be cured with drugs41. 

          Folic acid, a dietary component in the green leafy vegetables was soon identified as a necessary ingredient for normal bone marrow function. An observation that folic acid deficiency could produce bone marrow changes similar to exposure of Nitrogen mustard lead to interest in development of folic acid antagonists for the treatment of cancer. Initial folic acid antagonists were aminopterin and amethopterin. Sidney Farber of Boston found out that children with leukemia can be put in to temporary remission by folic acid antagonist aminopterin42. Amethopterin, now better known as methotrexate found many uses in the treatment of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. 1950s can be considered as the new era of chemotherapy and during this period many new drugs including pyramidine antagonists, vinca alkaloids and actinomycin-D were introduced into cancer treatment43, 44. The year 1956 brought a breakthrough with the announcement of cure of a patient with metastatic choriocarcinoma using the chemotherapy drug methotrexate, the first metastatic cancer cured to that date45. Around 1951 Hitchings and Elion identified two drugs namely 6-thioquanine and 6-mercaptopurine which later became very important in the treatment of acute leukemia46, 47. 

          Next several years witnessed the surge of newer and newer chemotherapy drugs for treatment of various hematological malignancies and solid tumors. Most prominent of these chemotherapy drugs were Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin. 

          Success in cure of choriocarcinoma was soon followed by reports of cure of Hodgkin lymphoma and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in 1960s. Even with the discovery of some chemotherapy drugs, surgery and radiation therapy were the main forms of treatment till mid 1960s. It was soon realized surgery and radiation cured only a fraction of patients. Chemotherapy was subsequently explored for adjuvant use, which is treatment of patients who had no gross disease after surgery or radiation, to prevent microscopic disease from progressing in future. Around this time various combination chemotherapies were developed and these combinations were found to be much more effective than use of single agent chemotherapy drugs. Conquest of metastatic testicular cancer was first reported in 1970s48. 

          The age of targeted therapy began somewhere in 1990s. The first targeted monoclonal antibodies, rituximab (Rituxan) and trastuzumab (Herceptin) were used in the treatment of lymphoma and breast cancer respectively. An astonishing array of monoclonal antibodies is now in use and many more are in development. Around the same time several more classes of targeted therapy were introduced. This included Growth signal inhibitors like imatinib (Gleevec), Angiogenesis inhibitors like bevacizumab (Avastin), and antibody drug conjugates. Angiogenesis inhibitors targets new blood vessel formation by the tumor. Antibody drug conjugates like Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg) consist of a monoclonal antibody bound to a highly potent chemotherapy drug. The antibody part targets the cancer cell and subsequently the molecule enters the cell and delivers the entire chemotherapy payload inside the cancer cell leading to the death of the cancer cell. 

          In the modern era most cancers are curable if identified in the early stages with combinations of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Many diseases are curable with chemotherapy and radiation even if they are metastatic or are in advanced in stage. List of diseases that can be cured even in advanced stage IV disease includes choriocarcinoma and other embryonal germ cell tumors of women, testicular cancer, Acute leukemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and some subsets of Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, head and neck cancer and colon cancer. Treatment of cancer is a continuous and ongoing struggle between man and nature. With the advent of newer and newer treatments, the cancer retreats but find new mutations to defeat the new drug. In this battle cancer is losing more and more grounds and ultimately this is a battle, we human beings are going to win. 

First published online on August 04, 2005 at Medicineworld.org with subsequent updates. 

References:1. Rothschild, B. M., Tanke, D. H., Helbling, M. II & Martin, L.D: Epidemiologic study of tumors in dinosaurs. Naturwissenschaften, published online, doi:10.1007/s00114-003 0473-9 (2003).Carlos Pratesa,Sandra Sousaa et al. Prostate metastatic bone cancer in an Egyptian Ptolemaic mummy, a proposed radiological diagnosis. International Journal of Paleopathology. Volume 1, Issue 2, October 2011, Pages 98–103.Breasted JH. The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1930.Ebbell B. The Papyrus Ebers. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard; 1937.Pemberton O. Observations on the history, pathology and treatment of cancerous diseases. London: J. Churchill, 1858.Wolff J. Die Lehre von der Krebskrankheit von den altesten Zeiten bis zur Gegenwart. Jena: G. Fischer; 1907- 1928.Lawrence, J.E.P. (1935) Appendix A. In: Stone Age Races of Kenya (ed. L.S.B. Leakey), p. 139. Oxford University Press, London.Stathopoulos, G. (1975) Letter: Kanam mandible’s tumour. Lancet, 1, 165.Phelan, J., Weiner, M.J., Ricci, J.L., Plummer, T., Gauld, S., Potts, R. & Bromage, T.G. (2007). Diagnosis of the pathology of the Kanam mandible. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 103, e20.Bourgey, Louis, Observation et experience chez les médecins de la collection hippocratique. (Paris: J. Vrin, 1953).Laennec RTH. Propositions sur la doctrine d’Hippocrate, relativement a la me´decine-pratique. Paris: L’imprimerie de Didot Jeune, 1804.Littre E. Oeuvres Completes d’Hippocrate. Paris: J. B. Bailliere; 1846.Castiglioni A. Histoire de la Medecine. Paris: Payot; 1931.Constantini R. Aur. Corn. Celsi de Medicina libri octo. Amsterdam: Joannem Wolters, 1687.Hajdu SI. Greco-Roman thought about cancer. Cancer. 2004;100:2048-2051.Spencer WG. Celsus de Medicina. London: Heinemann; 1935-1938.Hajdu SI. 2000 years of chemotherapy of tumors. Cancer. 2005;103:1097-1102.Reedy, J. (1975) Galen on cancer and related diseases. Clio Medica, 10, 227–238.Major RH. A History of Medicine. Springfield: Ch. C. Thomas; 1954.Ricci JV.Aetius of Amida. Philadelphia: Blakiston;1950.Browne EG.Arabian Medicine. Cambridge: University Press;1921.Berdoe E.The Origin and Growth of the Healing Art. London: Swan Sonnenschein;1893.Fell JW.Treatise on Cancer and Its Treatment. London: J. Churchill;1857.Pilcher JE. Guy de Chauliac and Henri de Mondeville, a surgical retrospect. Ann Surg.1895; 21: 84-102.Harvey, William. On the Motion of the Heart and Blood in Animals. London: George Bell and Sons.Premuda, Loris (1970). "Aselli, Gaspare". Dictionary of Scientific Biography 1. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. pp. 315–316.Mustacchi, P and Michael B. Shimkin, Gendron's Enquiries into the nature, Knowledge and Cure of Cancers. Cancer, 9 (1956) 645-47.Morgagni GB (October 1903). "Founders of Modern Medicine: Giovanni Battista Morgagni. (1682-1771)". Medical Library and History Journal 1 (4): 270–7.Leake, Chauncey D. (1947). Letheon - The Cadenced Story of Anesthesia.Plinius C. Historia naturalis. Venice: J. von Speier, 1469.The medical works of Paulus AEgineta, the Greek physician /: translated into English, with a copious commentary, containing a comprehensive view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians, on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery : vol. 1 (1834).Paracelsus (Theophrastus Philippus Aurelous Bombastus von Hohenheim). De grandibus, de compositionibus, et dosibus receptorum ac naturalium libri septem. Myloecii, E.P. Fabricius, 1562.Digby K. Receipts in Physick and Chirurgy as also Cordial and Distilled Waters and Spirits.London: H. Brome, 1668.Salmon W. Systema Medicinale, A Compleat System of Physick, Theorical and Practical. London: T. Passinger, 1686.Etmullerus M. A Complete System of the Theory and Practice of Physic. London: Bell and Wellington, 1712.Motherby G. Medical Dictionary or, General Repository of Physic. London: Johnson, Robinson, Hamilton and Murray, 1791.Walshe WH. The Nature and Treatment of Cancer. London: Taylor and Walton, 1846.Lebert H. Traite´ Pratique des Maladies Cance´reuses et des Attetions curables confondues avec le cancer. Paris: J-B Bailliere, 1851.Ehrlich P. Farbenanalytische Untersuchungen zur Histologie und Klink. Berlin: A. Hirschwald, 1891.Ehrlich P. Beitra¨ge zur experimentellen Pathologie und Chemotherapie. Leipzig: Akad. Verlag., 1909.Goodman LS, Wintrobe MM, Dameshek W, Goodman MJ, McLennan MT. Nitrogen mustard therapy. Use of methylbis (beta-chloroethyl) amine hydrochloride and tris (betachloroethyl) amine hydrochloride for Hodgkin’s disease, lymphosarcoma, leukemia, and certain allied and miscellaneous disorders. JAMA. 1946;105:475–476.Farber S, Diamond LK, Mercer RD, Sylvester RF, Wolff JA. Temporary remission in acute leukemia in children produced by folic acid antagonism, 4-aminopterolyglutamic acid (aminopterin). N Engl J Med. 1948;238:787–793.Bergmann W, Feeney J. Contributions to the study of marine products. The nucleosides of sponges. Int J Org Chem. 1951; 16:981–987.Farber S. Carcinolytic action of antibiotics: puromycin and actinomycin-D. Am J Pathol. 1955;31:582.Li MC, Hertz R, Spencer DB. Effect of methotrexate therapy upon choriocarcinoma and chorioadenoma. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1956;93:361–366.Hitchings GH, Elion GB. The chemistry and biochemistry of purine analogs. Ann NY Acad Sci 1954;60:195–9.Elion GB, Singer S, Hitchings GH. Antagonists of nucleic acid derivatives. VIII. Synergism in combinations of biochemically related antimetabolites. J Biol Chem 1954;208:477–88.DeVita VT. The evolution of therapeutic research in cancer. N Engl J Med 1978;298:907–10.



Genetics may make us prone to getting cancer, but it is the things we put into our bodies--the food, drugs, water, and air we breath--that is the cause.

You mention small children and babies being afflicted with cancer as evidence of a genetic link, but think about the following facts. Cancer is a recent development. Prior to the destruction of our food supply, the production of drugs, and pollution of our air and water, cancer was basically NON-EXISTENT among all of humanity! It is only within the last couple hundred years that it began to rear its ugly head--particularly over the last 100 years.

Why do you think this is? If genetics were the cause, how come no one had cancer for the first 7,000 years of recorded human history? It was very, very rare.

Our genetics make us more or less susceptible to the influence of these cancer causing factors. They don't cause it. Cancer is self-inflicted whether we realize the cause or not. Remove the cause and remove the cancer.
 
I respectfully disagree

I believe cancer was just as prevalent in the beginning of time as it is now, we are just far enough advanced to know what we are looking at and label it as cancer, and we are living longer. The biggest risk factor for cancer is old age, if you live long enough you WILL eventually have some form or variation. I am not stating that it does not have an environmental aspect, because there are definitely teratogens and cancer contributing elements present everywhere we go

Same goes for this Autism argument, this label is what we are giving the children we just thought were "weird" years ago. Also, we are now open minded to the fact that we need to give someone a label and try to work around their defect than just expect them to conform.


I don't have the time or energy right now to get into this argument after typing my last 1,200 word response in a TP4U thread a few minutes ago, but as TrinityD said, I find this comment almost laughable. No offense towards you--it's just that everything I have studied over the last 15 year says the exact opposite. Even science is even now starting to prove some of the links between cancer and what we do to our bodies. Colon cancer is a good one to look into if you haven't studied up on this subject much.

Degenerative disease as a whole has exploded in the last 100 years--so much so that it is an undeniable fact. The only...and I mean ONLY reason people are living longer is because of modern medicine. Whereas people before would frequently die of contractible disease, infection, and a million other things unrelated to inherent physical health and vitality (which modern medicine can now treat), most people are now are dying of degenerative disease of some form, at least in modernized countries.

People are not getting healthier---we are getting sicker. Liver longer? Yes, but not because of greater health. We are now living longer, more sickly lives. As a whole, degenerative disease is a new affliction--self-caused and contributing to the decline and decay of humanity.
 
And now for the real facts.


History of cancer from MedicineWorld.Org

History of Cancer

From Medicineworld.org: History of cancer
Cancer MainCancer newsCancer terms 

History of Cancer

Kottapurath Kunjumoideen MD

View History of cancer PDF version

          Many believe that human cancer is probably as old as the human race. There is plenty of evidence from paleopathology to suggest that cancer appeared much before the human race appeared on this planet. Earliest evidence of cancer is found in fossilized dinosaur bone dating back to 70 million years. Researcher Bruce Rothschild and colleagues of the Northeastern Ohio University College of Medicine in Rootstown studied over 10,000 dinosaur vertebrae from 700 museums across North America. They studied several families of dinosaurs including Stegosaurus, Triceratops, Tyrannosaurus, and Hadrosaurs and found that only one family namely the Hadrosaurs, or 'duck-billed dinosaurs’ had evidence of cancer. Rothschild and colleagues found 29 tumors in bones of 97 members this group. Rothschild suggested that the food habits of these dinosaurs may have made them prone to cancer. Hadrosaurs ate conifers, which are high in carcinogenic chemicals. Identified tumors in this group included osteoblastoma, desmoplastic fibroma and metastatic cancer, however metastatic cancer was extremely rare and was found only in one specimen1.



3000 BC to 1500 BC
          Remains of the human mummies in Egypt provide the earliest evidence of human cancer. About 2250 years ago, some where in Egypt, a man today known only as M1, aged in his 50s struggled with a long, painful, progressive prostate cancer. He must have suffered from throbbing pain in his lower back, which then may have spread to other parts of his body and ultimately may have succumbed to his disease. Detailed analysis of this male Ptolemaic Egyptian mummy, from the Museu Nacional de Arqueologia (MNA) in Lisbon displayed several focal dense bone lesions located mainly on the spine, pelvis and proximal extremities. From the distribution of these osteoblastic metastatic lesions, it was hypothesized that prostate was the most likely origin of these metastatic lesions2. A type of very aggressive bone cancer namely Osteosarcoma has also been observed in Egyptian Mummies. Bony destruction suggestive of head and neck cancer were observed in some Mummies 

          It is obvious that cancer did not suddenly start appearing after modernization or industrialization. The oldest known description of human cancer is found in an Egyptian seven papyri, writing written between 3000-1500 BC. Two of them, known as the "Edwin Smith"3 and "George Ebers"4papyri, contain details of conditions that are consistent with modern descriptions of cancer. 

          Edwin Smith Papyrus is assumed to be the oldest medical literature available. Written approximately in 3000 BC, Edwin Smith Papyrus contains 48 case reports that are written on a thin roll of papyrus 15 feet long. This contains description regarding 8 cases of tumors or ulcers of the breast. The writer concluded that bulging tumor of the breast was a grave disease with no significant curative options. The Edwin Smith Papyrus recommended cauterization (the fire drill) as a palliative measure. 

          The Ebers Papyrus dated 1500 BC, describes a soft-tissue tumor, a fatty tumor and recommends that this should be excised. However, if the tumor is large or livid and on a limb, the author recommends that this be left alone untouched. The Ebers Papyrus also contains descriptions suggestive of cancers of the skin, uterus, stomach, and rectum. Additional descriptions regarding enlarged thyroids, polyps were also available in the text. In addition to description of the medical conditions, the author also describes pharmacological, mechanical, and magical treatments for these disorders. 

          The Sumerians, Chinese, Indians, Persians, and Hebrews developed their own parallel systems and introduced herbal remedies such as tea, fruit juices, figs, and boiled cabbage as treatment for cancer. The ancient Egyptian system of treatment typically mixed medicine and religion. These physicians treated patients for several forms of cancer. Hieroglyphic inscriptions and papyri manuscripts suggest that these ancient physicians were able to distinguish between benign and malignant tumors. They suggested that the surface tumors may be removed surgically much similar to the current medical practice. Compounds of barley, pig’s ear and other indigenous materials were suggested as treatment for cancer of the stomach and the uterus. Other commonly dispensed medications included ointments, enemas, castor oil, suppositories, poultices and animal parts5, 6. Most likely cancer was not a very prevalent disease in those olden days, because life expectancy was rather short and life style practices like prolonged breast feeding may have decreased the risk of breast cancer. It is worth noting that breast cancer is described more often than any other cancer in these ancient times. 

Oldest specimens of cancer
          The Kenam mandible is a jaw bone fragment found in Kenya by Louis Leakey in 1937. This is believed to be from an early hominid, estimated to have lived between 500,000 years to 1 million years ago. This specimen contained a tumor mass in the inner surface and this was often referred to the oldest specimen of cancer7. Some have suggested that this was osteogenic sarcoma, while others have argued that this could be Burkitt's lymphoma8. This mass was reexamined recently using latest techniques and the conclusion was that this was not a malignant tumor but instead was residue of a broken jaw9. The mummified skeletal remains of several Peruvian Incas, dating back 2400 years ago, contained abnormalities suggestive of malignant melanoma with diffuse metastases to bones, particularly of the skull and extremities. 

Early years
          Hippocrates, the great Greek physician (460-370 B.C), who is considered the father of medicine, is though to be the first person to clearly recognize difference between benign and malignant tumors. He is also the first person to use the terms cancer and carcinoma. Hippocrates noticed that blood vessels around a malignant tumor looked like the claws of crab. He named the disease Karakinos (the Greek name for crab) to describe tumors that may or may not progress to ulceration. His writings included description of cancers involving various parts of the human body. He used the word carcinos to describe a tumor, carcinoma to describe a malignant tumor and the word cancer to describe a non-healing malignant ulcer. Hippocrates has written extensively about diagnosis and medical treatment. His writing remained handwritten for centuries. In 1525 first Latin edition of Hippocrates writing appeared in print, and subsequently several Greek editions were published in Venice10. Hippocrates studied the natural history of various diseases and came to the conclusion that all diseases, including cancer, originate from natural causes. Hippocrates believed that imbalance between four humors (blood, phlegm, yellow bile and black bile) was the causative factor for tumors. He proposed that the non-healing ulcerated cancers arose due to excess of black bile. Hippocrates has recognized the "dark, beef glaze like vaginal discharge" in association with uterine ulceration, cancers of the skin, mouth, breast, and stomach. Hippocrates has written about breast cancer and described this as a condition with bloody discharge and recognized that this may lead the condition of blood stained intra abdominal fluid. He described anorectal condylomas and polyps in his writing and recommended use of a speculum for rectal examination if the lesion was higher up in the colon11, 12, 13. 

          Another renowned and influential Greek physician, Aulus Celsus (25 BC–AD 50) wrote, in Latin, his “De Medicina”, an encyclopedic listing of medical advances to that date. Several centuries later his written notes were printed in a book form, which is often cited as the first printed medical book. Celsus continued the Hippocratic way of thinking comparing cancer to a crab. In his book he describes several varieties of superficial cancers of face, mouth, throat, and penis. He also describes cancers of deeper organs including stomach, colon, liver, and spleen13, 14, 15, 16, 17. Celsus advocated treatment of superficial carcinomas with a topical application of boiled cabbage and a salted mixture of honey and egg white. He recommended that aggressive surgical treatment be undertaken for early cancer. He recognized that when breast cancer progresses, it tend to recur in the armpit which may lead to swelling of the arm, and in many cases may lead to death by spread to distant organs. 

          Claudius Galen (AD 129–217) is another great Greek physician who has given early description of cancer. He studied medicine at Alexandria and became one of the most famous physicians of ancient times. In Galen’s text "De Tumoribus Praeter Naturam" he gives a detailed description of tumors. He also, like Hippocrates, believed that "humoral" changes in the body are responsible for the development of cancer. He believed that thick black bile caused ulcerated and incurable cancer, whereas thin yellow bile was responsible for non-ulcerated and curable cancer. Galen has recommended no treatment for cancer, unless the cancer was involving the skin, in which case surgery was the choice of treatment. Galen proposed that cancer was a disease of the sick and should be treated with purgatives to decrease the accumulation of black bile. He is credited with creation of the term sarcoma for tumors with the appearance of raw meat. Galen has written extensively on various topics. He has written more than 100 notes on tumors and cancers alone. Handwritten copies of his writing were very popular and were distributed to various countries around the world18, 19. 

          Works of Hippocrates and Galen have been instrumental in releasing the practice of medicine from grips of superstitions and magic, and developing into a science of observation and logical reasoning. Aretaeus (AD 81-138) is credited with the first compilation of symptoms, signs and treatment of cancer of the uterus. He lived and practiced medicine in Alexandria, Egypt. He has recognized that there were two distinct forms of cancer: one was firm to the touch without ulceration and the other ulcerated and foul smelling. He wrote that both types of lesions as chronic and deadly, but the ulcerated lesions were especially bad with no hope of cure6. 

Constantinople and history of cancer
          In Europe the progress of medicine slowed down after the fall of the Roman Empire in AD 476. The great discoveries and revelations of Hippocrates and Galen spread to Constantinople and Bagdad, and these cities became prominent in the history of medicine. 

          Physicians of Constantinople continued to believe in the teachings of Hippocrates and Galen and developed the science further by their own observations. During this period, again, physicians continued to believe that cancer is caused by an excess of black bile, curable only in its earliest stages. At this time in history, intellectual headquarters of civilization spread across Constantinople, Cairo Alexandria and Athens. While this awakening was occurring in Constantinople, Europe was largely left in the darkness, where magic spells and myths ruled medical literature. Oribasius, a renowned physician, who lived Baghdad (325-403), had some interesting observations about cancer. He wrote that malignant tumors are painless most of the time. He also noted that malignant tumors were not as red as tumors arising from inflammation. He noted cutting of cancer tissue showed a scirrhous (firm) lesion mixed with coarse soft material (necrosis). Aetius (527-565), who was a royal physician in Constantinople, proposed mastectomy as a treatment of breast cancer20. Teachings of Hippocrates and Galen were translated to Arabic by Rhazes of Baghdad (860-932). Rhazes had studied malignant tumors and suggested that surgeons should not attempt to remove obstructions caused by cancer unless the cancer can be excised completely21. Albucasis (Spain: 1013-1106) is credited with introduction of surgical treatment of cancer22. 

Renaissance period
          In 1215, the Pope prohibited surgical operation asserting that this is a form of bloodshed. However, this did not stop some brave surgeons like Theodoric (1205-1296), who proposed that cancers, may invade muscle, blood vessels, and nerves. He proposed wide excision of cancer with healthy tissue around to ensure complete removal of the malignant tumor22, 23. A renowned French surgeon, Guy de Chauliac (1300-1368), wrote a chapter about cancer in his book, Chirurgia Magna. He described cancers as cold (without signs of inflammation) lesions and advocated wide surgical excision as the treatment[24. 

          During the Renaissance, beginning in the 15th century, physicians acquired greater knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the human body. This started an era, which has seen the advancement of surgery and development of rational therapies based on clinical observations. The theory that cancer is caused by excess of black bile continued to prevail through the 16th century. At this time cancer was considered incurable, however a variety of temporary measures were available including creams and pastes containing arsenic. Autopsies, performed by Harvey (1578-1657) in the 17th century, gave an insight in to the circulation system25. By about the same period Gaspare Aselli (1581-1626) discovered the lymphatic system and this led to the demise of centuries old theory that excess of black bile causes cancer26. The new theory suggested that abnormalities in the lymph and lymphatic system as the primary cause of cancer. A French physician, Claude Gendron suggested that cancer arises locally as a hard, growing mass, untreatable with drugs, and must be removed with all its "filaments"27. The discovery of microscope and further experiments by Anthony Leeuwenhoek (1632-1723) added momentum to the quest for the cause of cancer. 

Eighteenth century to modern era
          In 1761, Giovanni Morgagni of Padua started the practice of doing autopsies to understand the relationship of patient’s illness to pathologic findings after death. This practice greatly helped the progress of knowledge of medicine and oncology28. Jean Astruc and chemist Bernard, two 18th century physicians conducted research to confirm or disprove then current theories related to the origin of cancer. This was the pioneering efforts in experimental oncology. Many more physicians followed their footsteps, seeking better understanding of the secrets of cancer. John Hunter (1728-1793) a famous Scottish surgeon suggested that some cancers might be cured by surgery and described methods by which we can distinguish the surgically removable tumors. He suggested that, if tumor has not encroached to the nearby tissue and was still moveable, "There is no impropriety in removing it". 

          Discovery of anesthesia in 1844 by Wells allowed surgical techniques to flourish and the classic cancer operations such as radical mastectomy were developed29. Three surgeons namely Bilroth, Handley, and Halsted spearheaded "cancer operations" designed to remove the entire tumor along with the lymph nodes in the region where the tumor was located. The surgical work advanced so rapidly that the next hundred years became known as "the century of the surgeon." With progress of surgery, surgical resection of removable tumors became a routine practice. By late19th century, with the development of better microscopes to study cancer tissues, scientists gained more knowledge about the cancer process. These studies showed that cancer cells are markedly different in appearance compared to the surrounding normal cells from which they originated. Rudolf Virchow, who is often called the founder of cellular pathology, provided the scientific basis for the modern pathological diagnosis of cancer. He described clinical course of cancer in relation with microscopic findings. This approach led to the development of modern cancer surgery. Tissues removed by the surgeons were examined under the microscope to make a precise diagnosis of cancer. By looking at the cut margin of surgical specimens the pathologist was able to tell the surgeon if the procedure had completely removed the tumor. 

          The early 20th century saw great progress in our understanding of microscopic structure and functioning of the living cells. Researchers pursued different theories to the origin of cancer, subjecting their hypotheses to systematic research and experimentation. A virus causing cancer in chickens was identified in 1911. Many chemical and physical agents that may lead to development of cancer were identified during later part of the 20th century. Later part of the 20th century also witnessed tremendous improvement in our understanding of the cellular mechanisms related to cell growth and division.

Many factors that suppress and activate the cell growth and division were identified and the knowledge continues to grow. 

History of chemotherapy for cancer
          Earliest documents indicate that various natural remedies were used for treatment of cancer. Medications including ointments, pastes, plasters, powders, aromatic water, wine and medicated herbal solutions were used in ancient times. Herbal products were the main ingredients of early cancer treatments, but minerals and animal products like liver, bone and urine were also used in treatment. 

          Pliny (AD 23-79) prescribed simple remedies (like cabbage juice) for the treatment of cancer. For oral use he developed a boiled mixture of ash of sea crabs, egg white, honey, and stinging nettle with salt30. Celsus prescribed diet, medications and surgery for cancer. Galen proposed that cancer may be treated with compound natural herbal remedies15. Paulus of Aegina (625–690), an eminent Greek physician, proposed mandrake as a form of cancer treatment. Mandrake is a plant with split roots. It resembled the body and legs of a man and was believed to possess magical properties including ability to cure cancer31. Purgatives and paregoric remedies containing arsenic, camphor, licorice, honey, alcohol, and boiled viper’s flesh were often used in Medieval Europe for the treatment of cancer and cancer related wasting13. Paracelsus (1493-1541), a physician from Switzerland introduced many chemicals including mercury, lead, sulfur, iron, zinc, copper, arsenic, iodine, and potassium for the treatment of various illnesses. He believed that gradually increasing doses of chemicals can be used as chemotherapy treatment for cancer32. 

          During later periods, various chemicals including mercury and arsenic were used as external and internal treatment for cancerous lesions. It was believed that use of iodine would help to prevent progression of breast cancer beyond the primary site33, 34. Etmullerus in 1712 compiled a collection of available treatments for various illnesses and in this there are several references to treatment of cancer. In these descriptions of Tinctura vitriolata and crab’s eye are mentioned as beneficial for treatment of cancer35. Motherby’s Medical Dictionary, published in 1791, recognized that cancer is incurable and recommended palliative treatment using vinegar, crow’s foot, dogfennel, or arsenic36. In and around 1850s belladonna plaster and mercurial soap gained prominence as curative treatment of breast cancer37, 38. The first clinical trial in the history of medicine was conducted in 1857 at Middlesex Hospital in London to compare the results of medical treatment to surgical treatment23. The clinical trial ended without any clear cut conclusions to superiority of one modality of treatment over the other. 

          Ehrlich is credited with introduction of the term “chemotherapy”. In its early days the term was used for the practice of using chemicals like arsenic to treat syphilis. Ehrlich published a paper in 1891 describing staining methods to differentiate lymphoid and myeloid cells and first described the term myeloid leukemia39. During this period Ehrlich was doing research hoping to develop chemotherapy drugs for cancer. He was working with various chemical compounds including paramidobenzol, phenylarsenoxyl, diamidoarsenobenzol, and pyocyanase for treatment of cancer. In 1909 Ehrlich summarized his own findings and cotemporary knowledge in a 247 page book, which is often referred to as the first book of chemotherapy for cancer40. In 1896 Roentgen discovered X-ray and within the next few years radiation found its place in the treatment of cancer. It was later discovered that daily low doses of radiation spread over several weeks greatly improved the patient’s chance for a cure of cancer. This finding paved the path for development of modern radiation therapy, which is now far more complex in efficiency and precision. Development of radiation therapy, in addition to development of newer chemical compounds added further momentum to the cancer treatment. 

          Trysin and amylopsin were introduced in 1921, which is considered to be starting point of modern chemotherapy. Based on experiences in World War I and then an accident in World War II with mustard gas scientists concluded that this could be used as an anti-cancer agent. Examination of victims who died from exposure to Nitrogen mustard showed that many had atrophy of their bone marrow and lymph nodes. This observation lead to the introduction of Mustard gas in to the treatment of a group of hematological malignancies called lymphoma, or cancers of the lymph glands. Alfred Gilman and Gustaf Lindskog used this drug in an animal model of lymphoma and found that it actually worked. This drug was first tried on a patient by name Dr. Lindskog, who was having trouble breathing because of a large lymphoma tumor mass in his neck. The drug worked and the patient had a very dramatic response. Publication of this finding was delayed due to military secrets involved with Nitrogen mustard. Lindskog finally published his findings in 1946. Initially there was a real enthusiasm in the oncology field, however it soon gave away to despair and pessimism with the finding that the response to Nitrogen mustard is only short lived and incomplete. Many acclaimed physicians including famous hematologist William Dameshek, were so much disappointed by the apparent set back that they became harsh critics of national drug development program arguing that cancer could never be cured with drugs41. 

          Folic acid, a dietary component in the green leafy vegetables was soon identified as a necessary ingredient for normal bone marrow function. An observation that folic acid deficiency could produce bone marrow changes similar to exposure of Nitrogen mustard lead to interest in development of folic acid antagonists for the treatment of cancer. Initial folic acid antagonists were aminopterin and amethopterin. Sidney Farber of Boston found out that children with leukemia can be put in to temporary remission by folic acid antagonist aminopterin42. Amethopterin, now better known as methotrexate found many uses in the treatment of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. 1950s can be considered as the new era of chemotherapy and during this period many new drugs including pyramidine antagonists, vinca alkaloids and actinomycin-D were introduced into cancer treatment43, 44. The year 1956 brought a breakthrough with the announcement of cure of a patient with metastatic choriocarcinoma using the chemotherapy drug methotrexate, the first metastatic cancer cured to that date45. Around 1951 Hitchings and Elion identified two drugs namely 6-thioquanine and 6-mercaptopurine which later became very important in the treatment of acute leukemia46, 47. 

          Next several years witnessed the surge of newer and newer chemotherapy drugs for treatment of various hematological malignancies and solid tumors. Most prominent of these chemotherapy drugs were Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin. 

          Success in cure of choriocarcinoma was soon followed by reports of cure of Hodgkin lymphoma and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in 1960s. Even with the discovery of some chemotherapy drugs, surgery and radiation therapy were the main forms of treatment till mid 1960s. It was soon realized surgery and radiation cured only a fraction of patients. Chemotherapy was subsequently explored for adjuvant use, which is treatment of patients who had no gross disease after surgery or radiation, to prevent microscopic disease from progressing in future. Around this time various combination chemotherapies were developed and these combinations were found to be much more effective than use of single agent chemotherapy drugs. Conquest of metastatic testicular cancer was first reported in 1970s48. 

          The age of targeted therapy began somewhere in 1990s. The first targeted monoclonal antibodies, rituximab (Rituxan) and trastuzumab (Herceptin) were used in the treatment of lymphoma and breast cancer respectively. An astonishing array of monoclonal antibodies is now in use and many more are in development. Around the same time several more classes of targeted therapy were introduced. This included Growth signal inhibitors like imatinib (Gleevec), Angiogenesis inhibitors like bevacizumab (Avastin), and antibody drug conjugates. Angiogenesis inhibitors targets new blood vessel formation by the tumor. Antibody drug conjugates like Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg) consist of a monoclonal antibody bound to a highly potent chemotherapy drug. The antibody part targets the cancer cell and subsequently the molecule enters the cell and delivers the entire chemotherapy payload inside the cancer cell leading to the death of the cancer cell. 

          In the modern era most cancers are curable if identified in the early stages with combinations of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Many diseases are curable with chemotherapy and radiation even if they are metastatic or are in advanced in stage. List of diseases that can be cured even in advanced stage IV disease includes choriocarcinoma and other embryonal germ cell tumors of women, testicular cancer, Acute leukemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and some subsets of Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, head and neck cancer and colon cancer. Treatment of cancer is a continuous and ongoing struggle between man and nature. With the advent of newer and newer treatments, the cancer retreats but find new mutations to defeat the new drug. In this battle cancer is losing more and more grounds and ultimately this is a battle, we human beings are going to win. 

First published online on August 04, 2005 at Medicineworld.org with subsequent updates. 

References:1. Rothschild, B. M., Tanke, D. H., Helbling, M. II & Martin, L.D: Epidemiologic study of tumors in dinosaurs. Naturwissenschaften, published online, doi:10.1007/s00114-003 0473-9 (2003).Carlos Pratesa,Sandra Sousaa et al. Prostate metastatic bone cancer in an Egyptian Ptolemaic mummy, a proposed radiological diagnosis. International Journal of Paleopathology. Volume 1, Issue 2, October 2011, Pages 98–103.Breasted JH. The Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1930.Ebbell B. The Papyrus Ebers. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard; 1937.Pemberton O. Observations on the history, pathology and treatment of cancerous diseases. London: J. Churchill, 1858.Wolff J. Die Lehre von der Krebskrankheit von den altesten Zeiten bis zur Gegenwart. Jena: G. Fischer; 1907- 1928.Lawrence, J.E.P. (1935) Appendix A. In: Stone Age Races of Kenya (ed. L.S.B. Leakey), p. 139. Oxford University Press, London.Stathopoulos, G. (1975) Letter: Kanam mandible’s tumour. Lancet, 1, 165.Phelan, J., Weiner, M.J., Ricci, J.L., Plummer, T., Gauld, S., Potts, R. & Bromage, T.G. (2007). Diagnosis of the pathology of the Kanam mandible. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 103, e20.Bourgey, Louis, Observation et experience chez les médecins de la collection hippocratique. (Paris: J. Vrin, 1953).Laennec RTH. Propositions sur la doctrine d’Hippocrate, relativement a la me´decine-pratique. Paris: L’imprimerie de Didot Jeune, 1804.Littre E. Oeuvres Completes d’Hippocrate. Paris: J. B. Bailliere; 1846.Castiglioni A. Histoire de la Medecine. Paris: Payot; 1931.Constantini R. Aur. Corn. Celsi de Medicina libri octo. Amsterdam: Joannem Wolters, 1687.Hajdu SI. Greco-Roman thought about cancer. Cancer. 2004;100:2048-2051.Spencer WG. Celsus de Medicina. London: Heinemann; 1935-1938.Hajdu SI. 2000 years of chemotherapy of tumors. Cancer. 2005;103:1097-1102.Reedy, J. (1975) Galen on cancer and related diseases. Clio Medica, 10, 227–238.Major RH. A History of Medicine. Springfield: Ch. C. Thomas; 1954.Ricci JV.Aetius of Amida. Philadelphia: Blakiston;1950.Browne EG.Arabian Medicine. Cambridge: University Press;1921.Berdoe E.The Origin and Growth of the Healing Art. London: Swan Sonnenschein;1893.Fell JW.Treatise on Cancer and Its Treatment. London: J. Churchill;1857.Pilcher JE. Guy de Chauliac and Henri de Mondeville, a surgical retrospect. Ann Surg.1895; 21: 84-102.Harvey, William. On the Motion of the Heart and Blood in Animals. London: George Bell and Sons.Premuda, Loris (1970). "Aselli, Gaspare". Dictionary of Scientific Biography 1. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. pp. 315–316.Mustacchi, P and Michael B. Shimkin, Gendron's Enquiries into the nature, Knowledge and Cure of Cancers. Cancer, 9 (1956) 645-47.Morgagni GB (October 1903). "Founders of Modern Medicine: Giovanni Battista Morgagni. (1682-1771)". Medical Library and History Journal 1 (4): 270–7.Leake, Chauncey D. (1947). Letheon - The Cadenced Story of Anesthesia.Plinius C. Historia naturalis. Venice: J. von Speier, 1469.The medical works of Paulus AEgineta, the Greek physician /: translated into English, with a copious commentary, containing a comprehensive view of the knowledge possessed by the Greeks, Romans, and Arabians, on all subjects connected with medicine and surgery : vol. 1 (1834).Paracelsus (Theophrastus Philippus Aurelous Bombastus von Hohenheim). De grandibus, de compositionibus, et dosibus receptorum ac naturalium libri septem. Myloecii, E.P. Fabricius, 1562.Digby K. Receipts in Physick and Chirurgy as also Cordial and Distilled Waters and Spirits.London: H. Brome, 1668.Salmon W. Systema Medicinale, A Compleat System of Physick, Theorical and Practical. London: T. Passinger, 1686.Etmullerus M. A Complete System of the Theory and Practice of Physic. London: Bell and Wellington, 1712.Motherby G. Medical Dictionary or, General Repository of Physic. London: Johnson, Robinson, Hamilton and Murray, 1791.Walshe WH. The Nature and Treatment of Cancer. London: Taylor and Walton, 1846.Lebert H. Traite´ Pratique des Maladies Cance´reuses et des Attetions curables confondues avec le cancer. Paris: J-B Bailliere, 1851.Ehrlich P. Farbenanalytische Untersuchungen zur Histologie und Klink. Berlin: A. Hirschwald, 1891.Ehrlich P. Beitra¨ge zur experimentellen Pathologie und Chemotherapie. Leipzig: Akad. Verlag., 1909.Goodman LS, Wintrobe MM, Dameshek W, Goodman MJ, McLennan MT. Nitrogen mustard therapy. Use of methylbis (beta-chloroethyl) amine hydrochloride and tris (betachloroethyl) amine hydrochloride for Hodgkin’s disease, lymphosarcoma, leukemia, and certain allied and miscellaneous disorders. JAMA. 1946;105:475–476.Farber S, Diamond LK, Mercer RD, Sylvester RF, Wolff JA. Temporary remission in acute leukemia in children produced by folic acid antagonism, 4-aminopterolyglutamic acid (aminopterin). N Engl J Med. 1948;238:787–793.Bergmann W, Feeney J. Contributions to the study of marine products. The nucleosides of sponges. Int J Org Chem. 1951; 16:981–987.Farber S. Carcinolytic action of antibiotics: puromycin and actinomycin-D. Am J Pathol. 1955;31:582.Li MC, Hertz R, Spencer DB. Effect of methotrexate therapy upon choriocarcinoma and chorioadenoma. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1956;93:361–366.Hitchings GH, Elion GB. The chemistry and biochemistry of purine analogs. Ann NY Acad Sci 1954;60:195–9.Elion GB, Singer S, Hitchings GH. Antagonists of nucleic acid derivatives. VIII. Synergism in combinations of biochemically related antimetabolites. J Biol Chem 1954;208:477–88.DeVita VT. The evolution of therapeutic research in cancer. N Engl J Med 1978;298:907–10.

I "LOL" at your "time for the "facts" comment. What Facts? That cancer has been around for million of years? No one denied that. What we are denying is that cancer is just a matter of genetic chance, with no connection to what we do to ourselves.

Pay attention to what I said. I said cancer was "basically" non-existent (in humanity), as in "comparison" to today. That was my point. If you had read what I actually said...and more importantly read what I said in context, there would have been no need to copy & paste a mile long commentary on something that no one is arguing about.

Your copy & paste does nothing to disprove what I said. There are many, many, many people who agree with me and the others in this thread (including MD's and other doctors), which is that cancer ...and degenerative in general, is largely attributable to what we do to ourselves and has exploded in recent years. This was my entire point. But of course, all we need to do is wait for Stewie to guve us the "facts" by posting up a cut & paste from some "MD" (doesn't matter of a million other MD's disagree).


Way to misrepresent my words me once again, which you seem to have a habit of doing time an time again.

Oh, by the way, I am getting ready to re-visit your claim that all of the AI's are equal in their effects on lipids. Apparently, some of the most respected people--doctors--in the field disagree with you whole-heartedly.
 
Last edited:
I said "basically" non-existent (in humanity), as in "comparison" to today. That was my point.

You seem to love to copy & paste stuff, but frequently have very little of your own to add. I find this is often the case with people in your field.

By the way, your copy & paste does nothing to disprove what I said. There are many, many, many people of renown who agree with me and the others in this thread, which is that cancer ...and degenerative in general, is largely attributable to what we do to ourselves, not caused by genetics.

I "LOL" at your "time for the "facts" comment. What Facts? That cancer has been around for million of years? No one denied that. What we are denying is that cancer is just a matter of genetic chance, with no connection to what we do to ourselves.

Way to misrepresent my words me once again, which you seem to have a habit of doing time an time again.

Oh, by the way, I am getting ready to re-visit your claim that all of the AI's are equal in their effects on lipids. Apparently, some of the most respected people--doctors--in the field disagree with you whole-heartedly.
Also in stewies quote, it does say that the earliest form of cancer, from the dinosaur, was caused or created by his diet of conifers which were high in carcinogenic chemicals. Thus lending itself to believe diet was the main culprit. One flaw in that report is that it never touches on diet again throughout all the discussion of the different periods. I bet if they delved deeper in the writings, diet would come up more than not. But its purposefully left out of the article.
 
Last edited:

Staff online

  • Big A
    IFBB PRO/NPC JUDGE/Administrator

Forum statistics

Total page views
559,731,460
Threads
136,134
Messages
2,780,643
Members
160,448
Latest member
Jim311
NapsGear
HGH Power Store email banner
your-raws
Prowrist straps store banner
infinity
FLASHING-BOTTOM-BANNER-210x131
raws
Savage Labs Store email
Syntherol Site Enhancing Oil Synthol
aqpharma
YMSApril210131
hulabs
ezgif-com-resize-2-1
MA Research Chem store banner
MA Supps Store Banner
volartek
Keytech banner
musclechem
Godbullraw-bottom-banner
Injection Instructions for beginners
Knight Labs store email banner
3
ashp131
YMS-210x131-V02
Back
Top